KETAN PATEL v. TESTPAK, INC

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-3064-07T13064-07T1

KETAN PATEL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

TESTPAK, INC.,

Defendant-Respondent.

______________________________

 

Submitted June 1, 2009 - Decided:

Before Judges Carchman and Simonelli.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Morris County, Docket No. L-2983-05.

Ketan Patel, appellant pro se.

Javerbaum, Wurgaft, Hicks, Kahn, Wikstrom & Sinins, attorneys for respondent (Gary E. Roth, of counsel and on the brief).

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff Ketan Patel appeals from two January 18, 2008 orders of the Law Division, granting the summary judgment motion filed by defendant Testpak, Inc., and denying plaintiff's cross-motion for entry of judgment. On appeal, plaintiff raises the following contentions:

CLAIMANT'S RETALIATORY DISCHARGE AND DISCRIMINATORY LAY OFF BY TESTPAK INC TOWARDS HIS OPPOSITION OF DISCRIMINATION HARRASSMENT, MENTAL AND PHYSICAL HARASSMENT, DIFFERENTIAL TREATMENT, DIFFERENTIAL PAY FOR SAME WORK, CONSPIRACYS IMPLEMENTED BY THE COMPANIES MANAGEMENT PEOPLES INCLUDING THE SUPERVISORS AND THE QUALITY ASSURANCE MANAGER, USING RACIAL SLURS, PUTTING DEFAMING ALLEGATIONS, MAKING FALSE STATEMENTS AND EVIDENCES AGAINST THE CLAIMANT, MISUSING THE NAMES OF INDIAN EMPLOYEES TO CREATE FALSE EVIDENCES AND STATEMENTS, NOT PAYING OVERTIME MONEY TO MANY INDIANS, DESTROYING DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCES, COMMITTING FRAUD, FORGERY, PERJURY, VIOLATING LABOR LAWS, VIOLATING LAD AND CIVIL RIGHTS ACT ETC.

Based on our careful review of the record, we conclude that that plaintiff's contentions are without sufficient merit to warrant discussion in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). We affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Dumont's January 18, 2008 oral opinion.

Affirmed.

 

(continued)

(continued)

2

A-3064-07T1

June 24, 2009