PITSTOP 33, INC. v. TOWNSHIP OF FREEHOLD
Annotate this CaseNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-3080-06T23080-06T2
PITSTOP 33, INC. and MICHAEL
PUCCIO,
Plaintiffs-Appellants/
Cross-Respondents,
v.
TOWNSHIP OF FREEHOLD, THOMAS E.
ANTUS, HENRY STRYKER, III, and
GUY LEIGHTON,
Defendants-Respondents,
and
THE ESTATE OF GIOVANNI F. CIALLELLA;
ANGELINA C. CIALLELLA; GIOVANNI F.
CIALLELLA OR ANGELINA C. CIALLELLA,
CO-TRUSTEES OF THE GIOVANNI F.
CIALLELLA REVOCABLE TRUST; and ANNA
MARIE GARAFANO,
Defendants-Respondents/
Cross-Appellants.
_______________________________________
SCOTT RADICE and DIANE RADICE,
Plaintiffs,
v.
TOWNSHIP OF FREEHOLD, NEW JERSEY,
GIOVANNI F. CIALLELLA, and PITSTOP 33,
Defendants.
_________________________________________
Argued February 14, 2008 - Decided
Before Judges Sapp-Peterson and Messano.
On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Monmouth County, Docket No. L-336-04.
Howard W. Weber argued the cause for appellants/cross-respondents.
Anthony M. Rainone argued the cause for respondents (Podvey, Meanor, Catenacci, Hildner, Cocoziello & Chattman, attorneys; Robert L. Podvey, of counsel and on the brief; Mr. Rainone, on the brief).
Neil M. Day argued the cause for respondents/cross-appellants (Coughlin Duffy, attorneys; Mr. Day, of counsel and on the briefs; Lynn M. LaPierre and Michael W. Starr, on the briefs).
PER CURIAM
We have been advised that this matter has been amicably adjusted and the parties have requested the dismissal of this appeal and cross-appeal. Accordingly, the appeal and cross-appeal are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Also referred to as Thomas G. Antus in portions of the appellate record.
By order dated March 1, 2004, Docket No. L-886-04, Radice v. Township of Freehold, was consolidated under Docket No. L-336-04, Pitstop 33, Inc. v. Township of Freehold, for disposition.
(continued)
(continued)
2
A-3080-06T2
July 21, 2008
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.