JOHN TAIMANGLO, et al. v. THE 1245 BOARDWALK & COMPANY, L.L.C., et al.
Annotate this CaseNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-5792-04T15792-04T1
JOHN TAIMANGLO and PATRICIA
SKLENCAR,
Plaintiffs-Appellant,
vs.
THE 1245 BOARDWALK & COMPANY, L.L.C.
and ROSE McCARTHY,
Defendants-Respondents,
and
181 SOUTH, INC.,
Intervenor/Third-Party
Plaintiff-Respondent,
vs.
JOHN TAIMANGLO and 1245 BOARDWALK
& COMPANY, L.L.C.,
Third-Party Defendants.
__________________________________
Submitted: November 1, 2006 - Decided November 20, 2006
Before Judges Cuff and Fuentes.
On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Atlantic County, Docket No. C-122-04.
Sherman, Silverstein, Kohl, Rose & Podolsky, attorneys for appellants (Alan C. Milstein, of counsel and on the brief; Michael Dube, on the brief).
Barker & Scott, attorneys for respondents The 1245 Boardwalk & Company, L.L.C. and Rose McCarthy (Joseph M. Scott, on the brief).
Holtzman & McClain, attorneys for respondent 181 South, Inc. (Stephen D. Holtzman, of counsel; Jeffrey S. McClain, on the brief).
PER CURIAM
The matter having been amicably adjusted and the parties having stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal, it is hereby ordered that the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
(continued)
(continued)
2
A-5792-04T1
November 20, 2006
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.