JOHN TAIMANGLO, et al. v. THE 1245 BOARDWALK & COMPANY, L.L.C., et al.

Annotate this Case

 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-5792-04T15792-04T1

JOHN TAIMANGLO and PATRICIA

SKLENCAR,

Plaintiffs-Appellant,

vs.

THE 1245 BOARDWALK & COMPANY, L.L.C.

and ROSE McCARTHY,

Defendants-Respondents,

and

181 SOUTH, INC.,

Intervenor/Third-Party

Plaintiff-Respondent,

vs.

JOHN TAIMANGLO and 1245 BOARDWALK

& COMPANY, L.L.C.,

Third-Party Defendants.

__________________________________

 

Submitted: November 1, 2006 - Decided November 20, 2006

Before Judges Cuff and Fuentes.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Atlantic County, Docket No. C-122-04.

Sherman, Silverstein, Kohl, Rose & Podolsky, attorneys for appellants (Alan C. Milstein, of counsel and on the brief; Michael Dube, on the brief).

Barker & Scott, attorneys for respondents The 1245 Boardwalk & Company, L.L.C. and Rose McCarthy (Joseph M. Scott, on the brief).

Holtzman & McClain, attorneys for respondent 181 South, Inc. (Stephen D. Holtzman, of counsel; Jeffrey S. McClain, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

The matter having been amicably adjusted and the parties having stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal, it is hereby ordered that the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

 

(continued)

(continued)

2

A-5792-04T1

November 20, 2006

 


Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.