ELAINE BELL v. DARRIN RESH
Annotate this CaseNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-5662-04T55662-04T5
ELAINE BELL,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DARRIN RESH,
Defendant-Respondent,
____________________________________________________________
Submitted March 14, 2006 - Decided March 31, 2006
Before Judges Coburn and Collester.
On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey,
Law Division, Salem County, L-132-02.
Marcozzi & Marcozzi, attorneys for appellant
(Anthony P. Marcozzi, Jr., on the brief).
Gruccio, Pepper, DeSanto & Ruth, attorneys
for respondent (Joseph E. Ruth, on the brief).
PER CURIAM
In this two-car automobile intersection accident, the trial judge granted defendant's motion for an involuntarily dismissal pursuant to Rule 4:37-2(b). The judge did so because plaintiff testified that she never saw defendant's vehicle before the impact. There was no other evidence from which a jury could have drawn any inferences supporting plaintiff's allegation that defendant's negligence caused the accident.
On appeal, plaintiff contends that the trial judge erred in dismissing the action. After carefully considering the record and briefs, we are satisfied that plaintiff's arguments are without sufficient merit to warrant discussion in a written opinion, R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E), and we affirm substantially for the reasons expressed by the trial judge in his thorough and well-reasoned oral opinion of May 24, 2005.
Affirmed.
(continued)
(continued)
2
A-5662-04T5
March 31, 2006
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.