EUGENE BELLUSCI v. VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD
Annotate this CaseNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-5576-04T35576-04T3
EUGENE BELLUSCI,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD,
Defendant-Respondent.
___________________________________
Argued June 6, 2006 - Decided June 28, 2006
Before Judges Skillman and Axelrad.
On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, Docket No. L-11832-04.
Michael A. Bukosky argued the cause for appellant (Loccke & Correia, attorneys; Mr. Bukosky, on the brief).
Dominick J. Bratti argued the cause for respondent (Grotta, Glassman & Hoffman, attorneys; Mr. Bratti, of counsel; Keith J. Rosenblatt, on the brief).
PER CURIAM
Plaintiff appeals from the summary judgment entered on June 10, 2005, which dismissed his complaint on the grounds that the Law Division lacked jurisdiction over the matter and that plaintiff failed to exhaust the administrative remedies available in his appeal currently pending before the Merit System Board and Office of Administrative Law. We affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Russello's written opinion on the reverse side of the order granting defendant summary judgment.
Affirmed.
(continued)
(continued)
2
A-5576-04T3
June 28, 2006
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.