STEPHEN J. NAPIER v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et al.
Annotate this CaseNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-1948-05T21948-05T2
STEPHEN J. NAPIER,
Appellant,
v.
BOARD OF REVIEW,
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and
LAWES ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE,
Respondent.
___________________________________________________
Submitted May 24, 2006 - Decided June 28, 2006
Before Judges Stern and Parker.
On appeal from the Board of Review,
Department of Labor, Docket No. 89,122.
Stephen J. Napier, appellant pro se.
Zulima V. Farber, Attorney General, attorney
for respondent (Patrick DeAlmeida, Assistant
Attorney General, of counsel; Alan C. Stephens,
Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).
PER CURIAM
Claimant, Stephen J. Napier, appeals from the final administrative determination of the Board of Review which affirmed the Appeal Tribunal's decision of October 20, 2005, and denied his claim for unemployment benefits as he "left work voluntarily without good cause attributable to the work." N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). There is no substantial dispute with the Appeal Tribunal's finding that:
The claimant was employed as a project manager for the above-named employer for four (4) years until 09/02/05, when a separation from employment occurred due to the claimant's loss of a valid driver's license. The claimant's license was suspended for DWI. A valid driver's license was a prerequisite for the job.
In light of the loss of claimant's driving privileges, a prerequisite to his employment, and because it became "difficult" for his employer "to schedule jobs," we affirm the Board's determination. Yardville Supply Co. v. Bd. of Review, 114 N.J. 371, 377 (1989) (holding that "[w]here it is reasonably foreseeable that an employee's voluntary conduct will render him unemployable, and his actions actually do lead to the loss of a prerequisite of employment, the employee leaves work voluntarily without good cause attributable to such work under N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a)").
Affirmed.
(continued)
(continued)
2
A-1948-05T2
June 28, 2006
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.