Nebel v. Nebel

Annotate this Case

103 N.J. Super. 216 (1968)

247 A.2d 27

JEANNE D. NEBEL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, v. ARTHUR J. NEBEL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 14, 1968.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, KOLOVSKY and CARTON.

Mr. Colin M. Dillon argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Pollis, Williams, Pappas & Dillon, attorneys).

Mr. Harold G. Pierson argued the cause for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The Chancery Division order under appeal is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated by Judge Wood, 99 N.J. Super. 256. The record provides substantial support for his findings and conclusions.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.