DeMarco v. Estlow
Annotate this Case21 N.J. Super. 356 (1952)
91 A.2d 272
ANTHONY R. DeMARCO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FRANCIS ESTLOW, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 15, 1952.
Decided September 22, 1952.
Before Judges McGEEHAN, BIGELOW and SMALLEY.
Mr. James D. Stockwell argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Bleakly, Stockwell & Zink, attorneys).
Mr. James M. Davis, Jr., argued the cause for the respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Haneman in his opinion filed in the Chancery Division and reported in 18 N.J. Super. 30.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
