Kurowski v. Bd. of Adjustment of Bayonne

Annotate this Case

11 N.J. Super. 433 (1951)

78 A.2d 429

CASIMIR KUROWSKI AND LUCILLE KUROWSKI, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE, A CORPORATE BODY, AND MORRIS PADWE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 2, 1951.

Decided January 17, 1951.

*444 Before Judges FREUND, PROCTOR and ROGERS.

Mr. Stephen P. Piga argued the cause for the plaintiffs-appellants.

Mr. William Rubin argued the cause for the defendant-respondent Board of Adjustment of the City of Bayonne.

Mr. A. Alfred Fink, attorney for defendant-respondent Morris Padwe.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Brennan in the court below.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.