Advertising
Annotate this Case 87 N.J.L.J. 190
March 26, 1964
Appointed by the New Jersey Supreme Court
OPINION 35
Advertising
This inquiry involves the propriety of an attorney permitting the publication of an unsolicited advertisement described as an "article" in a legal periodical by a nationally known dictation machine manufacturer in which his efficient and advantageous use of the machine is vividly portrayed by words and photograph. In our opinion the cooperation and acquiescence of the lawyer in publication of such an "article" would be in violation of the Canons of Professional Ethics, Canon 27. See N.J. Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics, Opinion 38, 87 N.J.L.J. 190 (1964), and ABA Comm. on Professional Ethics and Grievances, Opinion 42 (1931).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
