State v. Newman
Annotate this CaseAfter a jury trial, Defendant was convicted of multiple felony convictions, including two counts of first degree murder. Defendant was tried jointly with his accomplice. The Supreme Court affirmed Defendant’s convictions and sentences, holding (1) Defendant’s identification by the State’s primary witness did not violate his due process rights; (2) the district court did not err in admitting an exhibit showing six calls received by Defendant on the day of the shootings; (3) the district court did not err in overruling Defendant’s motions for mistrial and for new trial; (4) the district court did not err in excluding the statements of a confidential informant; (5) the district court did not err in limiting the scope of his cross-examination of the State’s primary witness; (6) the district court did not err in overruling Defendant’s motion to reopen the evidence; and (7) Defendant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel either lacked merit or could not be resolved.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.