State v. Stricklin
Annotate this CaseAfter a jury trial, Defendant was convicted of multiple felony convictions, including two convictions for first degree murder. Defendant was tried jointly with his accomplice. The Supreme Court affirmed Defendant’s convictions and sentences, holding that the district court did not err in (1) consolidating Defendant’s and his accomplice’s trials and overruling Defendant’s motion to sever; (2) excluding statements made by a confidential informant; (3) limiting the scope of Defendant’s cross-examination of the State’s primary witness; (4) instructing the jury; (5) overruling Defendant’s motion for new trial on the basis of juror misconduct; and (6) overruling Defendant’s motion to reopen the evidence. Further, Defendant failed to preserve his claim of prosecutorial misconduct for appellate review.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.