State v. Wilson
Annotate this Case
The Supreme Court affirmed Defendant's conviction of theft and burglary for stealing merchandise from the Ravalli Services Corporation donation intake center, holding that the district court did not err or abuse its discretion.
Specifically, the Supreme Court held that the district court (1) did not abuse its discretion by excluding F.Z., a developmentally disabled witness, as a witness on the ground that he was incompetent to testify; (2) did not err in instructing the jury to disregard testimony that Defendant applied for a job at a motel one year before committing the charges; and (3) did not abuse its discretion in permitting the State to call a certain rebuttal witness.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.