State v. Aguado
Annotate this CaseDefendant was charged with sexual abuse of children and sexual assault. The jury found Defendant guilty of sexual abuse of children but hung on the charge of sexual assault. At a second trial, the jury found Defendant guilty of the sexual assault charge. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the district court (1) did not err by denying Defendant’s requests for substitution of counsel; (2) did not violate Defendant’s confrontation rights by excluding evidence pursuant to Mont. Code Ann. 45-5-511(2); (3) did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Juror No. 5 in the second trial; and (4) properly instructed the jury when it utilized the pattern unanimity instruction from the Montana Pattern Jury Instructions.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.