State v. Rossbach
Annotate this CaseIn 2001, Appellant pled guilty to robbery. Since then, the district court revoked Appellant’s sentence three times. The latest revocation occurred in 2015. Appellant appealed, asserting that the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the revocation of his sentence on the grounds that the State did not comply with the statutory procedure set forth in Mont. Code Ann. 46-23-1012(2). The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the district court did not err in denying Appellant’s motion to dismiss the petition to revoke, as the State complied with the plain meaning of the statute.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.