State v. Thorpe
Annotate this CaseIn 2009, the municipal court granted the petition filed by the mother of A.L. for an order of protection restraining Defendant from being near A.L. From 2009 until 2012, A.L. received counseling for alleged sexual abuse by Defendant. In 2012, Defendant was found guilty of one count of violating an order of protection. The district court ordered Defendant to pay restitution for all of A.L.’s counseling. Defendant appealed the restitution order, arguing that the district court erred by ordering him to pay restitution for losses that were not caused by his violation of the order of protection. The Supreme Court vacated the order, holding that the district court erred by ordering restitution for counseling expenses that did not result from Defendant’s violation of the order of protection. Remanded.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.