SIMKINS v JAFFE

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

No. 12641 I N T E SUPREME C U T OF THE STATE O M N A A H OR F OTN 1974 HMS A GRY ROBERT G. SIMKINS and T O A G. H G E T , P l a i n t i f f s and A p p e l l a n t s , -vs - MORRIS JAFFE, WILLIAM H. SIPPEL e t a l . , Defendants and Respondents. Appeal from: D i s t r i c t Court of t h e E i g h t e e n t h J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t , Honorable Frank E. B l a i r , Judge p r e s i d i n g . Counsel of Record: For A p p e l l a n t s : Berg, ~ ' C o n n e l l ,Angel and Andriolo, Bozeman, Montana Ben E. Berg argued, Bozeman, Montana For Respondents: Brown and G i l b e r t , Bozeman, Montana Gene I. Brown argued, Bozeman, Montana C o r e t t e , Smith-and Dean, B u t t e , Montana Kendrick Smith argued, B u t t e , Montana Submitted: Decided: Filed : R ~ V 7974 September 9 , 1974 1 3 3974 M r . Chief J u s t i c e James T. H a r r i s o n d e l i v e r e d t h e Opinion of t h e Court. T h i s i s a n a p p e a l by p l a i n t i f f s from a summary judgment entered i n favor of defendants i n a slander of t i t l e a c t i o n e n t e r e d by t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t of G a l l a t i n County. The c o n t r o v e r s y g i v i n g r i s e t o t h i s l a w s u i t s t a r t e d i n J a n u a r y o f 1971. A t t h a t t i m e p l a i n t i f f s Simkins and Haggerty were d i r e c t o r s o f B r i d g e r Bowl, a n o n - p r o f i t c o r o o r a t i o n c r e a t e d f o r t h e purpose o f o p e r a t i n g s k i i n g f a c i l i t i e s i n B r i d g e r Canyon n e a r Bozeman, Montana. poration--learned The d e f e n d a n t s - - s t o c k h o l d e r s of the cor- t h a t P l a i n t i f f s were n e g o t i a t i n g t o s e l l 170 a c r e s o f l a n d a t t h e b a s e o f t h e ski h i l l . T h i s l a n d had been a c q u i r e d by p l a i n t i f f s i n 1966 f o r $34,000 w h i l e b o t h were d i r e c t o r s o f t h e c o r p o r a t i o n and was now b e i n g o f f e r e d f o r s a l e t o l a n d d e v e l o p e r s f o r $450,000. T h i s i s how m a t t e r s s t o o d on J a n u - a r y 1 4 , 1971, when t h e f o l l o w i n g l e t t e r was s e n t t o p l a i n t i f f s by d e f e n d a n t s ' a t t o r n e y , Gene I. Brown: J a n u a r y 1 4 , 1971 " M r . Thomas Haggerty 1209 South 5 t h Bozeman, Montana and "Mr. Robert Simkins 1419 South 3 r d Bozeman, Montana 59715 "Gentlemen : his f i r m h a s been r e t a i n e d by a number o f s h a r e h o l d e r s o f t h e Bozeman S t a t e P a r k R e c r e a t i o n a l Assoc i a t i o n , I n c . , o f Bozeman, Montana. I t h a s been w i d e l y rumored t h a t you i n t e n d t o s e l l o r d i s p o s e o f a l l o r a l a r g e p o r t i o n of t h e land a t t h e base of t h e Bridger I t was t h e Bowl S k i H i l l a c q u i r e d from J o h n F . N e u f f e r . u n d e r s t a n d i n g of t h e s e s t o c k h o l d e r s t h a t t h e Neuf f e r l a n d was a c q u i r e d by t h e c o r p o r a t i o n o r t h a t i t was a c q u i r e d by you i n d i v i d u a l l y on b e h a l f o f t h e c o r p o r a t i o n . (Emphasis added) ItThe f a c t t h a t t h i s l a n d was a c q u i r e d by you a t a t i m e when you were b o t h d i r e c t o r s o f t h e c o r p o r a t i o n and h a n d l i n g n e g o t i a t i o n s f o r t h e c o r p o r a t i o n t o p u r chase t h e land, lends s t r o n g support t o t h e conclus i o n s of t h e s e s t o c k h o l d e r s . (Emphasis added) "As you know, a d i r e c t o r o f a c o r p o r a t i o n h a s c e r t a i n w e l l d e f i n e d d u t i e s and o b l i g a t i o n s t o t h e c o r p o r a t i o n and s t o c k h o l d e r s h e s e r v e s . S t a t e d q u i t e simply, a d i r e c t o r cannot use h i s p o s i t i o n t o b e n e f i t himself t o t h e detriment of t h e corporation. A d i r e c t o r occupies a f i d u c i a r y r e l a t i o n s h i p t o t h e corp o r a t i o n and i t s s t o c k h o l d e r s and h i s a c t s must b e f o r t h e b e n e f i t of t h e c o r p o r a t i o n and n o t h i s own. (Emphasis added) "Under t h e law, s t o c k h o l d e r s have a r i g h t t o b r i n g l e g a l a c t i o n a g a i n s t o f f i c e r s and d i r e c t o r s o f a c o r p o r a t i o n i n t h e r i g h t of t h a t c o r p o r a t i o n based upon t h e o f f i c e r s o r d i r e c t o r s b r e a c h of l e g a l d u t y t o t h e corporation. 11 The s t o c k h o l d e r s who have c o n t a c t e d me a r e y o u r f r i e n d s and n e i g h b o r s who have worked w i t h you o v e r t h e y e a r s t o d e v e l o p B r i d g e r Bowl S k i Area a s a community p r o j e c t . Your c o n t r i b u t i o n i n d e v e l o p i n g t h i s a r e a i s w i d e l y acknowledged ard i t i s d i f f i c u t f o r t h e s e men t o b e l i e v e you would u s e y o u r p o s i t i o n i n t h e c o r p o r a t i o n f o r your own b e n e f i t . For t h i s r e a s o n , t h e s e p e o p l e a r e a n x i o u s t o have t h e a i r c l e a r e d and t h e rumors s t o p p e d . T h i s c a n b e done by a t r a n s f e r of t h e land t o t h e corporation. "It i s t h e f e a r o f t h e s e s t o c k h o l d e r s t h a t i f t h i s l a n d were t o be t r a n s f e r r e d t o a n e n t i r e l y commercially o r i e n t e d p a r t y , t h a t t h e c h a r a c t e r of t h e s k i h i l l would be g r e a t l y a l t e r e d o r a t l e a s t t h e community would l o s e c o n t r o l of i t s f u t u r e development. 11 I n o r d e r t o a v o i d any m i s u n d e r s t a n d i n g , I w i s h t o p o i n t o u t t h a t i f a n a g r e e a b l e arrangement i s n o t reached i m m e d i a t e l y , we have been i n s t r u c t e d t o commence a l a w s u i t i n t h e D i s t r i c t Court t o have t h e l a n d t r a n s ferred t o t h e corporation. "A copy of t h i s l e t t e r i s b e i n g s e n t t o t h e Corporat i o n a t i t s p r i n c i p a l o f f i c e , and c o p i e s t o e a c h o f t h e members of t h e Board o f D i r e c t o r s , and i s t o b e c o n s i d e r e d a demand upon them t o t a k e a l l s t e p s n e c e s s a r y t o i n s u r e r e c o v e r y o f t h e r e a l p r o p e r t y and t h e r e t u r n t h e r e o f t o Bozernan S t a t e Park R e c r e a t i o n a l A s s o c i a t i o n , I n c . W e f u r t h e r w i s h by t h i s l e t t e r t o p u t a l l p r o s p e c t i v e p u r c h a s e r s o f t h e l a n d on n o t i c e t h a t t i t l e t o t h e l a n d i s d i s p u t e d . (Emphasis added) "We w i l l be a v a i l a b l e t o d i s c u s s t h i s m a t t e r w i t h your A t t o r n e y a t any t i m e . Since time i s o f t h e e s s e n c e , w e would a p p r e c i a t e h e a r i n g somethilgon t h i s m a t t e r w i t h i n f i v e days i n o r d e r t o a v o i d l i t i g a t i o n . II Yours v e r y t r u l y , GILBERT "BY: II II / s / GENE I. BROWN Gene I. Brown c c : Bozeman S t a t e Park R e c r e a t i o n a l Association, Inc. Bozeman, Montana 59715 To a l l members of t h e Board of D i r e c t o r s of t h e Bozeman S t a t e Park R e c r e a t i o n a l Association, Inc. Bozeman, Montana 59715 United Agencies 1602 West Main Bozeman, Montana 59715 T h i s l e t t e r was followed up by a n o t h e r l e t t e r , d a t e d February 3 , 1971, d i r e c t e d t o Robert E . Heath, a t t o r n e y f o r B r i d g e r Bowl : F e b r u a r y 3 , 1971 " ~ r Robert E. Heath, . A t t o r n e y a t Law H o l t e r & Heath 1 6 N . Tracy Avenue Bozeman, Montana 59715 "Dear M r . Heath : 11 I am w r i t i n g i n r e p l y t o your correspondence d a t e d January 28, 1971. I would l i k e t o f u r n i s h you w i t h t h e 1) Dick names of o u r c l i e n t s . They a r e a s f o l l o w s : F r a n c i s , 2) Volney S t e e l e , 3 ) Morris J a f f e , 4 ) D r . S i p p e l , 5) D r . L e n s i n k , 6 ) D r . P r u n t y , 7) Dave Vaughn, and 8 ) B i l l Merrick. "These above s t a t e d s t o c k h o l d e r s a r e concerned w i t h t h e p r e s e r v a t i o n and f u r t h e r development of t h e f a m i l y t y p e s k i a r e a a t B r i d g e r Bowl. The Bozeman S t a t e Park Recreational Associational, Inc., conceived, financed, and promoted B r i d g e r Bowl on t h e p r e m i s e . I t a p p e a r s now t h a t u n l e s s some immediate changes a r e made, t h e atmosphere a t B r i d g e r Bowl may change from a f a m i l y t y p e r e c r e a t i o n a r e a t o one t h a t i s p r i m a r i l y commerc i a l i n c h a r a c t e r . The t r a c t o f l a n d , l e s s t h e S a i n t B e r n a r d , p r e s e n t l y owned by Simkins and H a g g e r t y , s h o u l d b e a c q u i r e d by t h e Bozeman S t a t e Park R e c r e a t i o n a l A s s o c i a t i o n . The v a l u e f o r t h e b a s i s of t h i s a c q u i s i t i o n s h o u l d b e based on t h e o r i g i n a l p u r c h a s e p r i c e of $34,000.00 p l u s i n t e r e s t s u b s e q u e n t t o t h e September, 1966, p u r c h a s e d a t e . I n t h e e v e n t t h a t t h e a s s o c i a t i o n i s n o t now i n a p o s i t i o n t o assume t h i s f i n a n c i a l r e s p o n s i b i l i t y , t h e above named s t o c k h o l d e r s c a n a r r a n g e f o r t h e f i n a n c i n g . I t c a n be s u b s t a n t i a t e d by t h o s e knowledgeable o f t h e l a n d purchased by Simkins and Haggerty from M r . N e u f f e r t h a t t h e l a n d was t o have been purchased f o r t h e a s s o c i a t i o n , and n o t f o r them a s i n d i v i d u a l s . (Emphasis added) "There i s t o o u r knowledge no e v i d e n c e t h a t t h e A s s o c i a t i o n e v e r s u g g e s t e d t h a t Haggerty and Simkins a c q u i r e t h i s l a n d i n t h e i r own names. The t e r m s of t h i s p u r c h a s e i n September, 1966, by Simkins and Haggerty from N e u f f e r , were a p p r o x i m a t e l y $9,000 down and $5,100 a n n u a l l y f o r 5 y e a r s . I t would n o t have been d i f f i c u l t t o have t h i s money pledged by i n t e r e s t e d members o f t h e A s s o c i a t i o n , had a n a t t e m p t been made t o do s o . "It i s most d e s i r a b l e t h a t t h e l a n d i n q u e s t i o n b e l o n g t o t h e A s s o c i a t i o n . U l t i m a t e l y , much o f t h i s l a n d w i l l be u t i l i z e d f o r p a r k i n g , c h a l e t and l i f t e x p a n s i o n . The b a l a n c e w i l l s e r v e a s a n e x c e l l e n t b u f f e r zone f o r commercial development on a d j a c e n t p r i v a t e l y owned l a n d s . The a p p r e c i a t i o n i n t h e v a l u e o f t h i s t r a c t o f l a n d c a n be a t t r i b u t e d almost e n t i r e l y t o t h e s k i l i f t f a c i l i t i e s l o c a t e d t h e r e o n . The a s s o c i a t i o n b u i l t t h e s k i l i f t s , s o i t would seem o n l y l o g i c a l t h a t t h e A s s o c i a t i o n own t h e l a n d t h a t i s t h e c u r r e n t hub of t h i s development. "It i s t h e above named p a r t i e s s i n c e r e hope t h a t Simkins and Haggerty w i l l a g r e e t o s e l l t h i s l a n d t o t h e A s s o c i a t i o n on t h e terms s e t f o r t h above. A s i m p l e p e a c e f u l s o l u t i o n i s p r e f e r r e d t o more d r a s t i c a c t i o n , which t h e above named a r e p r e p a r e d t o t a k e i f n e c e s s a r y . have i n q u i r e d f o r a n e x p l a n a t i o n of how t h e d i r e c t o r s have b r e a c h e d t h e i r d u t i e s t o t h e c o r p o r a t i o n . It should be pointed out t h a t it i s n o t o u r p o s i t i o n t h a t t h a t a l l o f t h e d i r e c t o r s have b r e a c h e d a d u t y t o t h e C o r p o r a t i o n . W a r e o n l y concerned w i t h t h e a c t i o n s of e W e r t y and Simkins i n a c q u i r i n g t h i s p r o p e r t y which i s s o v i t a l t o t h e f u t u r e of t h e corporation.(Emphasis added) "YOU -5- "It h a s become o b v i o u s t h a t o u r exchange o f l e t t e r s h a s o n l y c a u s e d c o n f u s i o n and s u s p i c i o n , f o r t h i s r e a s o n , I wish t o make t h e s u g g e s t i o n t h a t t h e s e v e n neut r a l board members meet w i t h o u r g r o u p a t t h e e a r l i e s t possible date. This w i l l give us an opportunity t o p r e s e n t o u r p o s i t i o n and t h e f a c t s a s we know them and t o answer any q u e s t i o n s t h e d i r e c t o r s may have. S i n c e everyone h a s i n mind t h e b e s t i n t e r s t s of t h e s k i h i l l , i t seems a p p r o p r i a t e t h a t a n e f f o r t be made t o r e s o l v e t h i s problem i n some r e a s o n a b l e manner. "I s u g g e s t t h a t we meet t h i s Thursday o r F r i d a y , o r i f t h i s i s n o t f e a s i b l e , t h e n n e x t Tuesday, a t t h e meeti n g room o f t h e Chamber o f Commerce a t 8:00 P.M. A copy o f t h i s l e t t e r i s b e i n g s e n t t o each member o f t h e Board. "It i s d i f f i c u l t t o a r r a n g e a meeting w i t h t h i s number o f p e o p l e , s o i f t h i s meeting i s n o t a g r e e a b l e , p l e a s e l e t me know. P l e a s e c o n t a c t me a s soon a s p o s s i b l e t o arrange f o r a time f o r t h i s meeting. It Yours v e r y t r u l y , "BROWN & GILBERT "BY : /s / GENE I . BROWN I1 Gene I . Brown I'GIB :s h 11 cc : Board members" T h e r e a f t e r on J u n e 2 , 1971, a t t h e a n n u a l meeting o f t h e s t o c k h o l d e r s o f B r i d g e r Bowl, a r e s o l u t i o n was passed which i n e s s e n c e a u t h o r i z e d t h e board of d i r e c t o r s t o t a k e w h a t e v e r s t e p s necessary t o gain t i t l e t o the disputed land. On June 4 , 1971, p l a i n t i f f s made a p r o p o s a l i n a n a t t e m p t t o s a t i s f y t h e d i s s i d e n t s t o c k h o l d e r s and on J u n e 11, 1971, e n t e r e d i n t o a c o n t r a c t w i t h B r i d g e r Bowl whereby t h e y conveyed t o B r i d g e r Bowl a p p r o x i m a t e l y 70 a c r e s of t h e d i s p u t e d l a n d a t i t s 1966 p u r c h a s e p r i c e , p l u s i n t e r e s t and t a x e s . On September 6 , 1971, p l a i n t i f f s b r o u g h t t h i s s l a n d e r of t i t l e a c t i o n . On J a n u a r y 1 4 , 1972, B r i d g e r Bowl b r o u g h t -6- s u i t a g a i n s t Simkins and Haggerty a l l e g i n g a b r e a c h o f f i d u c i a r y d u t y and s e e k i n g r e c o v e r y o f t h e b a l a n c e of t h e d i s p u t e d land. A s a r e s u l t of t h e l a t t e r s u i t , B r i d g e r Bowl a c q u i r e d a n a d d i t i o n a l 20 a c r e s o f l a n d , t h u s i n c r e a s i n g i t s t o t a l h o l d i n g s i n t h e d i s p u t e d l a n d t o 90 a c r e s . O August 3 , 1973, n t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t e n t e r e d i t s Order and Judgment w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e s l a n d e r of t i t l e a c t i o n . T h i s Order d e c l a r e d , i n t e r a l i a , t h a t t h e c o n t e n t s o f t h e l e t t e r s of J a n u a r y 1 4 , and F e b r u a r y 3 , 1971, were t r u e , n o t f a l s e , and t h a t a s a r e s u l t o f t h o s e l e t t e r s and t h e s t o c k h o l d e r s ' r e s o l u t i o n of J u n e 2 , 1971, p l a i n t i f f s t r a n s f e r r e d 70 a c r e s o f t h e d i s p u t e d l a n d t o B r i d g e r Bowl p u r s u a n t t o t h e J u n e 11, 1971, argeement. The O r d e r , on t h e t h e o r y o f r e s j u d i c a t a , a l s o a d o p t e d c e r t a i n amended f i n d i n g s o f f a c t and c o n c l u s i o n s o f law o f t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t i n t h e B r i d g e r Bowl c a s e a g a i n s t Simkins and Haggerty; namely, t h a t t h e agreement of J u n e 11, 1971, was a good and s u f f i c i e n t a c c o r d and s a t i s f a c t i o n o f t h e l a n d and t i t l e d i s p u t e between t h e p a r t i e s , and t h a t B r i d g e r Bowl was due a n a d d i t i o n a l 20 a c r e s of l a n d . Summary judgment was t h e r e u p o n e n t e r e d f o r d e f e n d a n t s . The e l e m e n t s of a c a u s e o f a c t i o n f o r s l a n d e r o f t i t l e a r e s e t f o r t h i n 50 Am.Jr.2d, L i b e l and S l a n d e r , § 541, p. 1060: "One who m a l i c i o u s l y p u b l i s h e s f a l s e m a t t e r which b r i n g s i n question o r disparages t h e t i t l e t o property, thereby c a u s i n g s p e c i a l damages t o t h e owner, may be h e l d l i a b l e i n a c i v i l a c t i o n for damages. The e s s e n t i a l e l e m e n t s o f t h e c a u s e o f a c t i o n , which a r e s u b s e q u e n t l y d i s c u s s e d , a r e t h e u t t e r i n g and p u b l i c a t i o n of t h e s l a n d e r o u s words t h e d e f e n d a n t , t h e f a l s i t y o f t h e words, m a l i c e , and s p e c i a l damages. The a c t i o n i s n o t f o r t h e words spoken, b u t f o r s p e c i a l damages f o r t h e l o s s s u s t a i n e d by r e a s o n of t h e s p e a k i n g and p u b l i c a t i o n of t h e s l a n d e r . " The c r u c i a l element i n t h i s c a s e i s t h e f a l s i t y of t h e words. Defendants chose t o s t a n d on t h e f i n d i n g of t h e d i s - t r i c t c o u r t t h a t t h e l e t t e r s were t r u e . P l a i n t i f f s take the p o s i t i o n t h a t e n t r y of summary judgment i n f a v o r o f t h e d e f e n d a n t s was improper, s i n c e t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t i n t h e B r i d g e r Bowl c a s e a g a i n s t p l a i n t i f f s found no b r e a c h of f i d u c i a r y duty on t h e i r p a r t , and t h e r e f o r e a m a t e r i a l q u e s t i o n of f a c t has n o t been r e s o l v e d . unsound. We. t h i n k p l a i n t i f f s ' p o s i t i o n on t h i s p o i n t i s For one t h i n g , t h e B r i d g e r Bowl c a s e a g a i n s t them i n - volved d i f f e r e n t f a c t s and d i f f e r e n t l e g a l p r i n c i p l e s t h a n t h e i n s t a n t c a s e ; a f i n d i n g of one c o u r t could v e r y w e l l d i f f e r from a f i n d i n g of t h e o t h e r c o u r t . For a n o t h e r , t h e r e i s s u b s t a n t i a l c r e d i b l e evidence i n t h e r e c o r d t o s u p p o r t t h e f i n d i n g t h a t t h e l e t t e r s were t r u e . Approximately s i x months a f t e r t h e l e t t e r s were w r i t t e n , and f o l l o w i n g passage of t h e r e s o l u t i o n by t h e B r i d g e r Bowl s t o c k h o l d e r s , 70 a c r e s o f t h e d i s p u t e d land was deeded t o Bridger Bowl by p l a i n t i f f s . The B r i d g e r Bowl c a s e a g a i n s t p l a i n t i f f s r e s u l t e d i n B r i d g e r Bowl r e c e i v i n g a n o t h e r 20 a c r e s of t h i s l a n d . A very p l a u s i b l e explanation f o r these events i s t h a t p l a i n t i f f s had o b l i g a t i o n s toward B r i d g e r Bowl and were compelled t o recognize i t s c l a i m s . S i n c e we have concluded t h a t p l a i n t i f f s have f a i l e d t o s u s t a i n t h e i r c a s e w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e element of f a l s i t y , i t i s unnecessary t o c o n s i d e r t h e o t h e r elements of a s l a n d e r of t i t l e action. The judgment i s a f f i r m e d . - - - - - e m - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Chief J u s t i c e We c o n c u r :

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.