STATE EX REL SAMMONS TRUCKING IN

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

No. 12194 I N T E SUPREME COURT O THE STATE O MONTANA H F F T E STATE O MONTANA, ex r e l , S M O S TRUCKING H F A MN I N C . , a Montana Corporation; NORTHERN TANK LINE, a Montana Corporation; and GREYHOUND LINES, I N C , , a C a l i f o r n i a Corporation, Relators, L U BOEDECKER, ALFRED C , L N L Y and ERNEST C , O A GE STEEL, A s Members of and comprising t h e BOARD O RAILROAD COMMISSIONERS and Ex-Officio PUBLIC F SERVICE COMMISSION of t h e S t a t e of Montana, Respondents. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING : Counsel of Record : For R e l a t o r s : Risken and S c r i b n e r , Helena, Montana. A. W. S c r i b n e r argued, Helena, Montana. For Respondents : Hon. Robert L. Woodahl, Attorney General, Helena, Montana. William E. 0 ' ~ e a r yand David L. A s t l e , Helena, Montana. William E. 0 ' ~ e a r yargued, Helena, Montana. Submitted: December 2 1 , 1971 PER CURIAM: This i s an o r i g i n a l proceeding brought a s a c l a s s a c t i o n by common c a r r i e r s o p e r a t i n g motor v e h i c l e s engaged i n i n t e r s t a t e commerce and u s i n g Montana highways. Applicants seek a d e c l a r a t o r y judgment and w r i t of mandate adjudging i n v a l i d c e r t a i n s t a t e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n , r e g i s t r a t i o n and l i c e n s i n g procedures a s imposed upon such v e h i c l e s t o t h e e x t e n t t h a t such s t a t e r e quirements impose g r e a t e r and c o n f l i c t i n g requirements t h a n t h o s e imposed by f e d e r a l law; and mandating t h e s t a t e accordingly* Oral argument was had following t h e f i l i n g of t h i s a p p l i cation. Respondents appeared through counsel f o r t h e P u b l i c S e r - v i c e Commission, who appeared l i k e w i s e f o r t h e a t t o r n e y g e n e r a l . Following o r a l argument respondents ' counsel i n d i c a t e d he would f i l e an answer a d m i t t i n g t h e f a c t s of t h e p e t i t i o n which has now been done. A l l p a r t i e s submitted t h e m a t t e r t o t h e Court f o r de- c i s i o n on t h i s b a s t s . From t h e undisputed f a c t s i t appears t h a t i n p a s t y e a r s t h e P u b l i c S e r v i c e Commission has r e g i s t e r e d motor c a r r i e r s i n i n t e r s t a t e commerce under t h e p r o v i s i o n s of s e c t i o n 8-123, R.C.M. 1947, and has f u r t h e r r e q u i r e d t h e r e g i s t r a t i o n and i n d e n t i f i c a t i o n of each v e h i c l e s o engaged on o r b e f o r e J u l y 1st of each y e a r ; t h e i s s u a n c e of m e t a l l i c l i c e n s e p l a t e s c a r r y i n g a d i f f e r e n t i d e n t i f i c a t i o n number v a l i d u n t i l J u l y 1 s t of t h e succeeding y e a r ; and has imposed a s a c o n d i t i o n t o t h e i s s u a n c e of such p l a t e and i d e n t i f i c a t i o n a t e n d o l l a r ($10.00) l i c e n s e f e e p r e s c r i b e d -2- by section 8-116, R.C.M. 1947. In 1965 the United States Congress enacted Public Law 89-170, imposing upon the Interstate Commerce Commission the duty of promulgating uniform standards for the registration and identification of interstate motor vehicles, applicable to all of the states of United States and to become effective five years from the date of such promulgation. This legisla- tion expressly declared : 11 To the extent that any state requirements for registration of motor carrier certificates or permits issued by the Commission impose obligations which are in excess of the standards or amendments thereto promulgated under this paragraph, such excessive requirements shall on the effective date of such standards, constitute an undue burden on interstate commerce. I t Acting pursuant to this authority the Interstate Commerce Commission has promulgated such standards applicable to the various states of United States. These became effective December 14, 1971, and provide for registration of each vehicle and issuance of identification stamps on or before January 31st of each calendar year. Such regulations further provide that the fee charged by the respective states for such registration and identification shall not exceed five dollars ($5.00) for each vehicle. The Public Service Commission intends to proceed under the provisions of state law rather than federal law,unless otherwise directed by this Court. The underlying issue here involved is whether the state statutes or the federal legislation and regulations of the Interstate Commerce Commission control. -3- W hold t h e f e d e r a l s t a t u t e and r e g u l a t i o n s promulgated e by t h e I n t e r s t a t e Commerce Commission i n connection t h e r e w i t h t o be c o n t r o l l i n g over c o n t r a r y p r o v i s i o n s of s t a t e law. The s t a t e law r e g u l a t i n g i d e n t i f i c a t i o n , r e g i s t r a t i o n and l i c e n s i n g procedures and f e e s of motor v e h i c l e s operated in by common c a r r i e r s i s c o n t a i n e d / c h a p t e r 184, Laws of 1931. This s t a t u t e has n o t been amended s i n c e i t s o r i g i n a l enactment. In 1947 t h e United S t a t e s Supreme Court h e l d t h a t t h e t e n d o l l a r ($10.00) l i c e n s e f e e r e q u i r e d f o r such v e h i c l e s f o r u s e of t h e Montana highways was v a l i d and d i d n o t c o n s t i t u t e an undue burden on i n t e r s t a t e commerce. Rwy. Com. v. Aero Mayflower Tran., 119 Mont. 118, 172 P.2d 452. P u b l i c Law 89-170 was enacted by t h e United S t a t e s Congress i n 1965 and r e g u l a t i o n s i n conformity t h e r e w i t h have been promu l g a t e d by t h e I n t e r s t a t e Commerce Commission. These n e c e s s i t a t e a n e n t i r e r e v i s i o n of t h e procedures provided by s t a t e law. Publ i c Law 89-170 makes i t unmistakably c l e a r t h a t a l l s t a t e s must follow t h e s e p r o v i s i o n s a f t e r t h e e f f e c t i v e d a t e , notwithstandi n g s t a t e laws o r r e g u l a t i o n s t o t h e c o n t r a r y . This a c t e x p r e s s - l y provides t h a t s t a t e requirements s h a l l n o t c o n s t i t u t e an undue burden on i n t e r s t a t e commerce i f t h e y a r e accomplished i n accordance w i t h t h e s t a n d a r d s which have been promulgated by t h e I n t e r s t a t e Commerce Commission. It a l s o e x p r e s s l y provides t h a t t o t h e e x t e n t s t a t e requirements pose g r e a t e r o b l i g a t i o n s , t h e y s h a l l c o n s t i t u t e an undue burden on i n t e r s t a t e commerce. By e n a c t i n g t h i s l e g i s l a t i o n Congress has pre-empted t h e f i e l d of s t a t e r e g u l a t i o n and i d e n t i f i c a t i o n of i n t e r s t a t e motor -4- v e h i c l e s u s i n g Montana highways. The laws and r e g u l a t i o n s of t h e United S t a t e s supersede t h e s t a t u t e s of t h e s t a t e of Montana on t h e same s u b j e c t t o t h e e x t e n t t h a t they a r e i n c o n f l i c t t h e r e w i t h and impose upon t h e P u b l i c S e r v i c e Commission t h e duty t o c a r r y o u t such p r o v i s i o n s by r e g i s t r a t i o n and i d e n t i f i c a t i o n of i n t e r s t a t e motor v e h i c l e s operated by common c a r r i e r s u s i n g t h e highways of Montana i n t h e manner p r e s c r i b e d by t h e f e d e r a l s t a t u t e s and r e g u l a t i o n s on o r b e f o r e January 31, 1972. Where a s t a t e s t a t u t e and a f e d e r a l s t a t u t e o p e r a t e upon t h e same subj e c t m a t t e r and p r e s c r i b e d i f f e r e n t r u l e s concerning i t , and t h e f e d e r a l s t a t u t e i s one w i t h i n t h e competency of Congress t o e n a c t , t h e s t a t e s t a t u t e must g i v e away. I n t e r s t a t e Commerce Commission v. D e t r o i t G . H. & M. R. Company, 167 U.S. 633, 42 L.Ed. 306, 17 S.Ct. 986; C i n c i n n a t i , N. 0. & T. P. R. Co. v. I n t e r s t a t e Commerce / F Commission, 162 U.S. 934; The United S t a t e s Supreme Court has d i - r e c t l y h e l d t h a t i f a c o n g r e s s i o n a l enactment occupies t h e f i e l d , United A . A . & A . I. W. v. / / f .: : 226, 100 L.Ed. 1-163, 76 S.Ct. i t supersedes o r pre-empts s t a t e law. Wisconsin Emp. Rel. Bd., 351 U.S. Congress has t h e power t o a c t and t o d e c l a r e what c o n s t i t u t e s an undue burden on i n t e r s t a t e commerce. Co. v. Arizona, 325 U.S. Southern P a c i f i c 761, 89 L.Ed 1915, 65 S.Ct. 1515 p u t s i t i n t h i s language: "congress has undoubted power t o r e d e f i n e t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n o f power over i n t e r s t a t e commerce. It may e i t h e r permit t h e s t a t e s t o r e g u l a t e t h e commerce i n a manner which would otherwise n o t o r exclude s t a t e regulabe p e r m i s s i b l e t i o n even of m a t t e r s of p e c u l i a r l y l o c a l concern which n e v e r t h e l e s s a f f e c t t h e i n t e r s t a t e commerce *** The m a t t e r i s a p t l y put i n 15 C.J.S. Commerce $15, p. 420: "In accordance w i t h t h e view t h a t t h e r e g u l a t i o n of commerce i s e x c l u s i v e l y w i t h i n t h e power of 9~ Congress, i f and when i t chooses t o a c t , where Congress r e g u l a t e s commerce by e n a c t i n g a s t a t u t e , w i t h i n i t s competency, t h a t covers t h e same s u b j e c t m a t t e r a s , o r i s i n d i r e c t c o n f l i c t w i t h , a s t a t e s t a t u t e , t h e e x e r c i s e d power of Congress i s not only supreme and paramount b u t a l s o e x c l u s i v e , superseding t h e s t a t e law and exc l u d i n g a d d i t i o n a l o r f u r t h e r r e g u l a t i o n covering t h e same s u b j e c t by t h e s t a t e l e g i s l a t u r e . This i s t r u e r e g a r d l e s s of t h e a u t h o r i t y under which t h e s t a t e may have a c t e d , such a s under i t s p o l i c e power. The same r e s u l t follows from t h e r e g u l a t i o n of a n agency o r i n s t r u m e n t a l i t y o f commerce by f e d e r a l commissions o r a g e n c i e s , such a s t h e i n t e r s t a t e commerce commission, o r by t h e s e c r e t a r y of commerce by v i r t u e of power p r o p e r l y d e l e g a t e d by Congress. 11 * * Accordingly we d e c l a r e t h a t t h e p r o v i s i o n s of P u b l i c I a w 89-170 and p a r t 1023 of T i t l e 49 of t h e Code of F e d e r a l Regulations a r e a p p l i c a b l e t o t h e r e g i s t r a t i o n and i d e n t i f i c a t i o n of motor veh i c l e s i n i n t e r s t a t e commerce u s i n g t h e highways of t h e s t a t e of Montana, and t h a t t o t h e e x t e n t t h a t Montana s t a t u t e s impose g r e a t e r and c o n f l i c t i n g requirements, t h e y c o n s t i t u t e a n undue burden on i n t e r s t a t e commerce and must g i v e way t o t h e f e d e r a l law. W spee c i f i c a l l y hold t h a t ~ o n t a n a ' sprevious l i c e n s i n g procedures i n c l u d i n g t h e i m p o s i t i o n of t h e t e n d o l l a r ($10.00) f e e imposed by s e c t i o n 8-116, R.C.M. 1947, a r e e x p r e s s l y i n c o n f l i c t w i t h f e d e r a l law and t h e s t a t e may impose a f e e no g r e a t e r t h a n f i v e d o l l a r s ($5.00) p e r v e h i c l e f o r such purpose i n accordance w i t h f e d e r a l r e g u l a t i o n s . Let aperemptory w r i t of mandate i s s u e accordingly.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.