State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, vs. Robert A. Dunn, Defendant/Appellant.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FIVE STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff/Respondent, vs. ROBERT A. DUNN, Defendant/Appellant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. ED101101 Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Charles County No. 1311-CR03752-01 Filed: August 19, 2014 Robert A. Dunn (Appellant) was convicted of driving while intoxicated. The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed Appellant on probation for two years. Appellant has now filed a notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction. This Court issued an order directing Appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed. Appellant did not file a response. We dismiss the appeal. In criminal appeals, section 547.070, RSMo 2000, limits the right of appeal to final judgments. In criminal cases, a judgment is final for purposes of appeal when the judgment and sentence are entered. State v. Welch, 865 S.W.2d 434, 435 (Mo. App. E.D. 1993). However, where imposition of sentence is not entered, but is suspended, the judgment is not final and a defendant may not appeal it. State v. Lynch, 679 S.W.2d 858, 860 (Mo. banc 1984); See also, State v. Larson, 79 S.W.3d 891 (Mo. banc 2002). Because the trial court suspended imposition of sentence, there is no final, appealable judgment. Where no final, appealable judgment exists, this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeal. State v. Moore, 352 S.W.3d 392, 398 (Mo. App. E.D. 2011). Therefore, the appeal is dismissed without prejudice for lack of a final, appealable judgment. __________________________________ ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, CHIEF JUDGE Lisa Van Amburg, J., and Philip M. Hess, J., Concur. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
