Raymond Greason v. State of Mississippi

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 96-CA-01261-SCT RAYMOND GREASON v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED, PURSUANT TO M.R.A.P. 35-A DATE OF JUDGMENT: TRIAL JUDGE: COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: 08/20/96 HON. LEE J. HOWARD LOWNDES COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT PRO SE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY: NATURE OF THE CASE: DISPOSITION: MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED: MANDATE ISSUED: BY: DEWITT T. ALLRED, III FORREST ALLGOOD CIVIL - POST CONVICTION RELIEF AFFIRMED - 12/8/97 12/17/97 2/23/98 BEFORE SULLIVAN, P.J., SMITH AND MILLS, JJ. MILLS, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: STATEMENT OF THE CASE This appeal comes from the Circuit Court of Lowndes County, which on August 20, 1996, dismissed Raymond Greason's motion for post-conviction collateral relief. On appeal before this Court, Greason assigns as error many issues. The following issue, however, is decisive in this case. ISSUE I. WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN DISMISSING GREASON'S MOTION FOR POST-CONVICTION COLLATERAL RELIEF AS UNTIMELY. FACTS Raymond Greason filed a motion for post-conviction collateral relief that was denied on January 23, 1995 by the trial court. The appeal from this motion was later dismissed by this Court. On June 28, 1996, Greason filed an "amended" motion in the trial court. In response, the trial court dismissed as frivolous both this "amended" motion, and a previous motion to expedite and supplement proceedings. DISCUSSION Greason argues that McNeal v. State, 658 So.2d 1345, 1349-50 (Miss.1995) is an "intervening decision" that operates to relieve him of the bar against successive writs. Greason is mistaken. An intervening decision mandates overcoming the bar against successive writs only when the intervening decision "would have actually adversely affected the outcome of [the defendant's] conviction or sentence." Lockett v. State, 656 So.2d 68, 72-73 (Miss.1995). McNeal is not such an intervening decision. Brandau v. State, 662 So.2d 1051, 1054 (Miss.1995). Furthermore, assuming that there was a formal defect in the indictment as to the placement of the words "against the peace and dignity, " Greason waived it when he pleaded guilty. Banana v. State, 635 So.2d 851, 853 (Miss.1994). CONCLUSION Accordingly, Greason's motion is barred by Miss. Code Ann. ยง 99-39-23(6) (1994). LOWER COURT'S DENIAL OF POST CONVICTION RELIEF AFFIRMED. PRATHER AND SULLIVAN, P.JJ., PITTMAN, BANKS, McRAE, ROBERTS AND SMITH, JJ., CONCUR. LEE, C.J., CONCURS IN RESULT ONLY.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.