Phillip Thrasher v. State of Mississippi
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI
NO. 96-CA-00419-SCT
PHILLIP THRASHER
v.
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED,
PURSUANT TO M.R.A.P. 35-A
DATE OF JUDGMENT:
TRIAL JUDGE:
COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT:
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY:
NATURE OF THE CASE:
DISPOSITION:
MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED:
MANDATE ISSUED:
05/07/96
HON. KENNETH COLEMAN
UNION COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
PRO SE
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
BY: DEIRDRE McCRORY
DAVID L. ROBINSON
CIVIL - POST CONVICTION RELIEF
REVERSED AND REMANDED - 10/16/97
11/6/97
BEFORE DAN LEE, C.J., PITTMAN AND MILLS, JJ.
MILLS, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT:
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
On May 9, 1996, the Circuit Court of Union County dismissed Phillip Thrasher's Motion to Modify
and/or Correct Sentence. Aggrieved, Thrasher appeals to this Court, assigning as error the following
issue:
WHETHER THE CIRCUIT COURT ERRED IN SUMMARILY DISMISSING
THRASHER'S MOTION TO MODIFY AND/OR CORRECT SENTENCE.
FACTS
While serving an eighteen-year sentence in the Mississippi Department of Corrections for multiple
offenses committed in Tishomingo County, Mississippi, Phillip Thrasher committed several crimes in
Union County, Mississippi.(1) On August 26, 1993, Thrasher was indicted in the Circuit Court of
Union County on two counts of burglary of a dwelling, to which charges he pleaded guilty. At his
guilty plea hearing on March 13, 1995, after the circuit court determined that his guilty plea was
knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily made, the following exchange occurred:
BY THE COURT: Does the State have a recommendation as to Mr. Thrasher?
BY MR. ROBINSON: Your Honor, it's my understanding Mr. Thrasher is currently serving a
term of 18 years. He's got charges against him in two cause numbers here in Union County. We
recommend to the Court a ten-year sentence in 93-133, an eight-year sentence in 93-134
consecutive. That would give him eighteen years in Union County, but run that concurrent with
the time he is currently serving now; and, of course, he's given credit for the time served since
he's been incarcerated.
BY THE COURT: I'm going to accept the recommendation of the State; and Mr. Phillip
Thrasher, I hereby sentence you to serve a term of 10 years in an institution to be designated by
the Mississippi Department of Corrections in cause number 93-133 and a term of eight years in
cause number 93-134. These will run consecutive, but they will run concurrent with the
sentence you are now serving from -- is it Tishomingo County?
BY MR. THRASHER: Yes, sir, eighteen year sentence. That time that I get now, is it back
dated?
BY MR. ROBINSON: Yes, sir.
BY THE COURT: And you'll be credited for the time served.
BY MR. THRASHER: Thank you, sir.
The Judgment of the Court, entered the same day, ordered the aforementioned sentence, but did not
indicate credit for time served in jail while awaiting disposition of the charges. Likewise, the court's
"Prisoner Commitment Notice" to the Mississippi Department of Corrections indicated that the date
of sentence was March 13, 1995, and did not indicate credit for time served.
On July 25, 1995, Thrasher filed in the circuit court a Motion to Modify and/or Correct Sentence. He
argued that contrary to what the judge told him at his guilty plea and sentencing hearing, he was not
given credit for time served on his Tishomingo County sentence. He requested that new commitment
papers be sent to the MDOC reflecting credit for time served on his original eighteen-year sentence
which began on November 11, 1987. On May 9, 1996, the circuit court dismissed Thrasher's motion,
finding that it was manifest that he was not entitled to any relief.
DISCUSSION
Thrasher argues that his sentence should be corrected so as to reflect the credit for time served
ordered by the judge at his guilty plea and sentencing hearing or, in the alternative, that his conviction
and sentence should be vacated on the ground that his guilty plea was not voluntary, since he was led
to believe that he would be given credit for time served on his original eighteen-year sentence.
Thrasher made no argument regarding the voluntariness of his guilty plea in his motion for post
conviction relief, and he may not raise this issue for the first time on appeal. Patterson v. State, 594
So. 2d 606, 609 (Miss. 1992); Gardner v. State, 531 So. 2d 805, 808-09 (Miss. 1988). Thrasher may
be entitled to some relief, however, regarding the modification and/or correction of his sentence.
The record clearly reflects that at Thrasher's guilty plea and sentencing hearing, the State
recommended that Thrasher be given credit for time served "since he's been incarcerated." The judge
accepted the State's recommendation, ordered the sentence and, after a question by Thrasher,
emphasized that Thrasher would be given credit for time served. Neither the Judgment of the Court
nor the "Prisoner Commitment Notice," however, provided for credit for time served. Miss. Code
Ann. ยง 99-19-23 (1972) provides as follows:
The number of days spent by a prisoner in incarceration in any municipal or county jail while
awaiting trial on a criminal charge, or awaiting an appeal to a higher court upon conviction,
shall be applied on any sentence rendered by a court of law or any sentence finally set after all
avenues of appeal are exhausted.
Thrasher is clearly not entitled to credit for time served on his original eighteen-year Tishomingo
County sentence which began on November 11, 1987, for he was not then incarcerated "while
awaiting trial" on the Union County charges. Nevertheless, the trial judge did proclaim the law of this
case when he emphasized that Thrasher would receive credit for time served. Consequently, Thrasher
is entitled to receive credit for the time served from the date of his arrest on the Union County
charges until the date of his conviction and sentence on those charges.
The record does not reflect, however, the date Thrasher was arrested on the Union County charges,
nor does it reflect whether, while awaiting trial on those charges, he was incarcerated "in any
municipal or county jail." It is quite possible, since he was already serving an eighteen-year sentence,
that Thrasher was incarcerated in the state penitentiary while awaiting trial on the Union County
charges, and thus under the statute, he would not be entitled to credit for time served. Thrasher's
"Prisoner Commitment Notice," dated March 13, 1995, states that he was "Presently Housed in
Parchman," but it does not indicate whether he had been incarcerated there since his arrest on the
Union County charges. Because the record reflects neither when Thrasher was arrested on the Union
County charges nor where he was thereafter incarcerated, this court reverses and remands to the
circuit court for determination of this matter. Upon reaching a determination of when Thrasher was
arrested, the trial court shall credit Thrasher with the time that he served between his arrest and guilty
plea.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
LEE, C.J., PRATHER AND SULLIVAN, P.JJ., PITTMAN, BANKS, McRAE, ROBERTS AND
SMITH, JJ., CONCUR.
1. There is no mention in the record of how Thrasher was able to commit the crimes in Union County
while serving an eighteen-year sentence, but his "Sentence Computation Data Sheet" shows 188 days
"TIME OUT ON ESCAPE," so perhaps it was during this time that he committed the crimes.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
