Sidney A. Woods v. State of Mississippi
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
NO. 2009-KA-00535-COA
SIDNEY A. WOODS
APPELLANT
v.
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
APPELLEE
DATE OF JUDGMENT:
TRIAL JUDGE:
COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT:
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY:
NATURE OF THE CASE:
TRIAL COURT DISPOSITION:
DISPOSITION:
MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED:
MANDATE ISSUED:
02/09/2009
HON. RICHARD A. SMITH
SUNFLOWER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
JOHNNIE E. WALLS JR.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
BY: JEFFREY A. KLINGFUSS
WILLIE DEWAYNE RICHARDSON
CRIMINAL - FELONY
CONVICTED OF AGGRAVATED ASSAULT
AND SENTENCED TO TWENTY YEARS IN
THE CUSTODY OF THE MISSISSIPPI
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WITH
FIFTEEN YEARS TO SERVE, FIVE YEARS
SUSPENDED, AND FIVE YEARS OF POSTRELEASE SUPERVISION, AND TO PAY
RESTITUTION AND $500 TO THE
MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS’
COMPENSATION FUND
AFFIRMED - 08/31/2010
BEFORE LEE, P.J., BARNES AND ROBERTS, JJ.
LEE, P.J., FOR THE COURT:
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶1.
On February 4, 2009, a jury in the Sunflower County Circuit Court found Sidney A.
Woods guilty of aggravated assault. Woods was sentenced to twenty years, with fifteen
years to serve in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections, five years
suspended, and five years’ post-release supervision. Woods was ordered to pay court costs,
assessments, restitution, and $500 to the Crime Victims’ Compensation Fund.
¶2.
Woods subsequently filed a motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in
the alternative, a new trial. The trial court denied Woods’s motion. Woods now appeals,
asserting that the evidence was insufficient to support the guilty verdict. Finding no error,
we affirm.
FACTS
¶3.
At approximately 1:00 a.m. on February 24, 2008, Woods and his wife, Markeedia
Sproulls, were closing Woods’s nightclub in Moorhead, Mississippi. Woods noticed a fight
in the parking lot outside between his brother-in-law, Steve Sproulls, and Xavier Dean.
Woods attempted to break up the fight, and whether it was intentional or not, he knocked one
of the men down. Christopher Davis testified he was trying to break up the fight when he
was pushed by Woods. The two men exchanged words, and Davis punched Woods in the
face. Woods stumbled and fell to the ground. Woods then pulled out a handgun and fired
five rounds at Davis. Two of the bullets hit Davis; one bullet hit the back of his leg, and the
other bullet hit his back. Woods testified that he knew Davis was unarmed. Davis testified
that he was walking away from Woods when Woods began shooting. Although several
witnesses for Woods testified that they did not see Woods shoot Davis, Woods admitted that
he had shot Davis.
DISCUSSION
2
¶4.
In his only issue on appeal, Woods argues that the evidence was insufficient to
support the guilty verdict. Woods specifically contends that he was not allowed to prove that
he shot Davis in self-defense. Our standard of review in regard to challenges to the
sufficiency of the evidence is well settled. “[T]he critical inquiry is whether the evidence
shows ‘beyond a reasonable doubt that accused committed the act charged, and that he did
so under such circumstances that every element of the offense existed[.]’” Bush v. State, 895
So. 2d 836, 843 (¶16) (Miss. 2005) (citation omitted). If, viewing the evidence in the light
most favorable to the State, any rational trier of fact could have found, beyond a reasonable
doubt, that the essential elements of the crime existed, this Court will affirm the conviction.
Id. If we find that reasonable, fair-minded jurors could have concluded that the defendant
was guilty of the accused crime, the evidence will be deemed sufficient. Id.
¶5.
Mississippi Code Annotated section 97-3-7(2)(b) (Supp. 2009) states that a person is
guilty of aggravated assault if he “attempts to cause or purposely or knowingly causes bodily
injury to another with a deadly weapon or other means likely to produce death or serious
bodily harm . . . .” Although Woods admitted to shooting Davis, he contends that he was not
allowed to show that he had acted in self-defense. The record belies Woods’s contention.
Woods and several witnesses testified that Davis was unarmed. Davis testified that he had
turned to walk away when Woods opened fire. The jury did hear testimony from Woods that
he had acted in self-defense. The jury was also instructed to find Woods not guilty if it found
he had acted in self-defense. Since Woods admitted that he had shot Davis, the elements of
aggravated assault were met. From the evidence presented, reasonable jurors could have
found Woods guilty of aggravated assault.
3
¶6.
Woods also argues that the jury should have been allowed to hear testimony
concerning his health. Woods contends that his medical conditions prevented him from
defending himself in any manner besides shooting Davis. Although Davis had punched
Woods in the face, Woods’s contention that his only option was to shoot him is unpersuasive.
The evidence showed that Woods shot Davis after Davis had turned away from him. Woods
had the option to walk away rather than shoot an unarmed man in the back. Furthermore,
Woods never made a proffer of what medical conditions prevented him from engaging in
physical activity. This issue is without merit.
¶7.
THE JUDGMENT OF THE SUNFLOWER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT OF
CONVICTION OF AGGRAVATED ASSAULT AND SENTENCE OF TWENTY
YEARS IN THE CUSTODY OF THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, WITH FIFTEEN YEARS TO SERVE, FIVE YEARS SUSPENDED,
AND FIVE YEARS OF POST-RELEASE SUPERVISION, AND TO PAY
RESTITUTION AND $500 TO THE MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS’
COMPENSATION FUND, IS AFFIRMED. ALL COSTS OF THIS APPEAL ARE
ASSESSED TO THE APPELLANT.
KING, C.J., MYERS, P.J., IRVING, GRIFFIS, BARNES, ISHEE, ROBERTS,
CARLTON AND MAXWELL, JJ., CONCUR.
4
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
