Leon McCoy v. State of Mississippi
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
NO. 2000-KA-01023-COA
LEON MCCOY
v.
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
DATE OF TRIAL COURT
JUDGMENT:
TRIAL JUDGE:
COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT:
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY:
NATURE OF THE CASE:
TRIAL COURT DISPOSITION:
APPELLANT
APPELLEE
03/28/2000
HON. ELZY JONATHAN SMITH JR.
BOLIVAR COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
RAYMOND L. WONG
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
BY: W. GLENN WATTS
LAURENCE Y. MELLEN
CRIMINAL - FELONY
POSSESSION OF COCAINE, SECOND AND
SUBSEQUENT OFFENDER: SENTENCED TO SERVE A
TERM OF 6 YEARS IN THE MDOC. POSSESSION OF
COCAINE, SECOND AND SUBSEQUENT: SENTENCED
TO 5 YEARS SHALL NOT BE REDUCED OR
SUSPENDED NOR SHALL THE DEFENDANT BE
ELIGIBLE FOR PAROLE OR PROBATION DURING THE
TERM OF SAID SENTENCE.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REMANDED IN PART- 3/19/2002
DISPOSITION:
MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED:
CERTIORARI FILED:
MANDATE ISSUED:
4/9/2002
BEFORE KING, P.J., IRVING, AND BRANTLEY, JJ.
KING, P.J., FOR THE COURT:
¶1. Leon McCoy was convicted of possession of cocaine by the Circuit Court of Bolivar County,
Mississippi, and sentenced to six years confinement as an habitual offender. He has appealed that
conviction and raises two issues for this Court's resolution. They are: (1) whether the arrest and subsequent
search of McCoy were not based upon probable cause, and (2) whether the State violated the rules of
discovery in presenting evidence of McCoy's prior conviction.
¶2. Finding no merit in these issues, this Court affirms.
FACTS
¶3. McCoy moved to suppress evidence of cocaine found upon his person, asserting that the search which
yielded this cocaine was not based upon probable cause. At the suppression hearing, Sgt. Mullins of the
Highway Patrol testified that upon noticing the expired inspection sticker on McCoy's vehicle, he stopped
him. McCoy's vehicle had a Florida tag.
¶4. McCoy, who was driving with a Florida license, was asked to step out of his vehicle. As McCoy did
so, Mullins noticed a bulge in McCoy's pocket. Mullins then inquired whether McCoy had any drugs or
weapons on his person, to which the response was no.
¶5. Because it was a hot day, Mullins had McCoy sit in the passenger seat of the patrol car, while a citation
was written for the expired inspection sticker, and a computer check of his driver's license was run. Mullins
noticed that McCoy seemed nervous and was "sweating profusely."
¶6. The dispatcher reported that McCoy had a criminal history, whereupon Mullins again inquired about his
possession of drugs or weapons. When McCoy again responded in the negative, Mullins asked about the
bulge in his pocket. In response, McCoy produced some coins from his pocket. However, the bulge
remained.
¶7. When Mullins inquired a third time about the bulge, McCoy attempted to exit the patrol car. Mullins
then pulled his weapon, told McCoy not to move, and called for assistance.
¶8. This call was answered by a police officer from Mound Bayou. Upon the arrival of this officer, Mullins
removed McCoy from the vehicle and arrested him for driving with an expired inspection sticker.
¶9. A search of McCoy after this arrest revealed that he possessed several substances which were later
confirmed to be cocaine.
ANALYSIS
1. PROBABLE CAUSE FOR ARREST
¶10. McCoy asserts that there was no probable cause for his arrest, and no legal basis for his search, and
this rendered inadmissible all evidence gathered as a result of an illegal search. As a basis for this assertion,
McCoy argues that because this was a misdemeanor traffic stop,(1) the Fourth Amendment to the United
States Constitution(2) precluded Mullins from doing anything other than giving McCoy a citation.
¶11. In Atwater v. City of Lago Vista, 532 U.S. 318, 354, (2001), the Supreme Court stated, "If an
officer has probable cause to believe that an individual has committed even a very minor criminal offense in
his presence, he may, without violating the Fourth Amendment, arrest the offender."
¶12. McCoy does not question that the inspection sticker had expired, nor does he dispute that driving
upon the highways of this state with an expired inspection sticker is a misdemeanor offense. Accordingly,
the Court sees no merit in his claims of constitutional protection.
¶13. This Court also notes that the arrest of McCoy was not inconsistent with Mississippi statutory law (3)
or case law which provides for the warrantless arrest of a suspect for a misdemeanor offense committed in
the officer's presence. Floyd v. City of Crystal Springs, 749 So. 2d 110, 114 (¶15) (Miss. 1999).
¶14. We find no merit in this position.
II. DISCOVERY VIOLATION
¶15. McCoy contends that the State violated the discovery provisions of URCCC Rule 9.04 in failing to
provide the "triple certificate" from Florida which was used to show McCoy's previous convictions in
sentencing him as an habitual offender. There is no doubt from the record that McCoy was provided with
copies of all documents provided to the circuit court. What he asserts is that the State failed to provide him
with copies "certified in triplicate." For a discovery violation to require reversal there must be a showing of
prejudice and the non-disclosed material must be more than simply "cumulative." Prewitt v. State, 755 So.
2d 537, 541(¶8) (Miss. 1999); Buckhalter v. State, 480 So. 2d 1128, 1128 (Miss. 1985). In this case,
there is no showing of prejudice. Any discovery violation that may have occurred was harmless. Therefore,
this issue is without merit.
¶16. This Court notes the existence of a conflict between the sentencing transcript and the sentencing order.
The transcript imposes a sentence of six years, while the sentencing order refers to both six years and five
years.
¶17. This Court deems it appropriate to affirm this conviction while remanding for correction of the
sentencing order.
¶18. THE JUDGMENT OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BOLIVAR COUNTY OF
CONVICTION OF POSSESSION OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE, COCAINE, SECOND
AND SUBSEQUENT OFFENDER IS AFFIRMED. THIS MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE
BOLIVAR COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT FOR CORRECTION OF THE SENTENCING
ORDER. ALL COSTS OF THIS APPEAL ARE ASSESSED TO BOLIVAR COUNTY.
McMILLIN, C.J., SOUTHWICK, P.J., BRIDGES, THOMAS, LEE, IRVING, MYERS,
CHANDLER AND BRANTLEY, JJ., CONCUR.
1. "Failure to display a valid inspection sticker on an operating vehicle is a misdemeanor and
punishable by a fine of not more than fifty dollars or sentence of not more than six months
confinement, or both." Miss. Code Ann. § 63-13-29 (Rev. 1996).
2. "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against
unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon
probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be
searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
3. "(1) An officer or private person may arrest any person without warrant, for an indictable offense
committed, or a breach of the peace threatened or attempted in his presence . . . ." Miss. Code Ann.
§99-3-7 (1) (Rev. 2000).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
