Christine Hogan v. State of Mississippi
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
NO. 2000-KA-01521-COA
CHRISTINE HOGAN
APPELLANT
v.
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
DATE OF TRIAL COURT JUDGMENT:
TRIAL JUDGE:
COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT:
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY:
NATURE OF THE CASE:
TRIAL COURT DISPOSITION:
DISPOSITION:
MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED:
CERTIORARI FILED:
MANDATE ISSUED:
APPELLEE
05/28/1998
HON. GRAY EVANS
LEFLORE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
K. ELIZABETH DAVIS
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
BY: SCOTT STUART
FRANK CARLTON
CRIMINAL - FELONY
SALE OF COCAINE: 30 YEARS WITH 15
YEARS SUSPENDED CONSECUTIVE TO
TIME BEING SERVED.
AFFIRMED - 12/17/2002
BEFORE KING, P.J., IRVING, AND BRANTLEY, JJ.
BRANTLEY, J., FOR THE COURT:
¶1.
Christine Hogan was convicted for the sale and delivery of a controlled substance by a Leflore
County Circuit Court. On appeal, she argues that the sentence imposed is tantamount to a life sentence
and is thereby illegal. Finding no error, we affirm.
FACTS
¶2.
On October 4, 1996, an undercover investigator with the Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics
contacted Hogan about purchasing some cocaine pursuant to a previous conversation that had occurred.
Hogan stated that she did not have any at that time but to come back later. When the investigator returned,
Hogan sold him 0.7 grams of crack cocaine for $100.
¶3.
Hogan was indicted by a grand jury for the sale and delivery of a controlled substance. She was
tried and convicted. The court sentenced Hogan to a term of thirty years, with fifteen years suspended and
to run consecutively to time being served in another cause. A motion for new trial was filed and denied.
Aggrieved, Hogan appeals arguing that her combined sentence is illegal because it is tantamount to a life
sentence.
ANALYSIS OF THE ISSUE PRESENTED
WHETHER THE TRIAL JUDGE ERRED IN DENYING HOGAN'S MOTION FOR
A NEW TRIAL DUE TO THE SENTENCE BEING TANTAMOUNT TO A LIFE
SENTENCE.
¶4.
Hogan argues that the sentence is illegal because when the sentence in this cause is added to the
sentence in the other cause, the total exceeds her life expectancy. Hogan was sentenced pursuant to Miss.
Code Ann. §41-29-139 (Rev. 2001). By statute, Hogan can be sentenced for no more than thirty years
upon conviction. Id. The State argues that each sentence is looked at separately and not in combination
with another.
¶5.
Under both convictions, Hogan was sentenced to thirty years to run consecutively. She argues that
when the sentences are combined it equals sixty years, which exceeded her life expectancy of thirty years
at the time of her sentencing. In her argument, Hogan relies on several cases where the Mississippi
2
Supreme Court overturned sentences for armed robbery that exceeded the defendants' life expectancy.
See Kennedy v. State, 626 So. 2d 103, 105 (Miss. 1993); Stewart v. State, 372 So. 2d 257, 259 (Miss.
1979). However, this reliance is misplaced. Both Kennedy and Stewart dealt with convictions and
sentences for armed robbery. Id. The provision prohibiting a sentence beyond the defendant's life
expectancy applies only to single sentences for armed robbery. Wash v. State, 807 So. 2d 452, 458
(¶20) (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). There is not a similar provision for the sale of cocaine.
¶6.
Even if there was a relevant provision which prohibited a sentence beyond a defendant's life
expectancy, that is not the case here. Hogan argues that the two sentences combined exceed her life
expectancy. The Mississippi Supreme Court has held that the "total of the sentences may exceed the
actuarial life expectancy of the defendant." Id. at 457 (¶16), citing Erwin v. State, 557 So. 2d 799, 803
(Miss.1990). Therefore, this issue is without merit.
¶7.
THE JUDGMENT OF THE LEFLORE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT OF CONVICTION
OF SALE OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE AND SENTENCE OF THIRTY YEARS IN
THE CUSTODY OF THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS WITH
FIFTEEN YEARS SUSPENDED TO RUN CONSECUTIVELY TO THE SENTENCE
IMPOSED IN CAUSE NO. 23,258 IS AFFIRMED. ALL COSTS OF THIS APPEAL ARE
ASSESSED TO LEFLORE COUNTY.
McMILLIN, C.J., KING AND SOUTHWICK, P.JJ., BRIDGES, THOMAS, LEE,
IRVING, MYERS AND CHANDLER, JJ., CONCUR.
3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
