John C. Bolton v. State of Mississippi
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
NO. 98-KA-00093 COA
JOHN C. BOLTON A/K/A JOHN C. BOLTON, JR.
v.
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
APPELLANT
APPELLEE
DATE OF JUDGMENT:
11/20/1997
TRIAL JUDGE:
HON. BILLY JOE LANDRUM
COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JONES COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT:
ANTHONY J. BUCKLEY
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
BY: SCOTT STUART
DISTRICT ATTORNEY:
JEANNENE PACIFIC
NATURE OF THE CASE:
CRIMINAL - FELONY
TRIAL COURT DISPOSITION:
11/20/1997: FELONY SHOPLIFTING: SENTENCED TO
SERVE A TERM OF 5 YRS IN THE CUSTODY OF
MDOC; 11/20/1997: FELONY SHOPLIFTING:
SENTENCED TO SERVE A TERM OF 5 YEARS
DISPOSITION:
AFFIRMED - 2/9/99
MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED:
CERTIORARI FILED:
MANDATE ISSUED:
4/12/99
BEFORE BRIDGES, C.J., PAYNE, AND SOUTHWICK, JJ.
BRIDGES, C.J., FOR THE COURT:
¶1. John C. Bolton, a/k/a John C. Bolton, Jr., was indicted, tried, and convicted of the crime of felony
shoplifting in the Jones County Circuit Court. He was sentenced to serve a term of five years in the custody
of the Mississippi Department of Corrections. Aggrieved, Bolton argues that he was denied effective
assistance of counsel citing the following ten trial deficiencies: 1) trial counsel failed to conduct an adequate
voir dire, 2) trial counsel failed to give an opening statement, 3) trial counsel failed to cross-examine the
State's first witness, Officer Brian Boutwell, 4) trial counsel failed to challenge the store manager's in-court
identification of the appellant, 5) trial counsel failed to object to hearsay testimony given by the arresting
officer, 6) trial counsel failed to cross-examine the arresting officer, 7) trial counsel failed to challenge the
admissibility of the appellant's confession, 8) trial counsel failed to object to the State's jury instruction S-1,
9) trial counsel gave a prejudicial closing argument, and 10) trial counsel failed to request a presentence
investigation after the appellant's conviction or to offer any mitigating testimony prior to sentencing. Finding
no merit to the issues raised, we affirm.
FACTS
¶2. On January 10, 1997, Bolton was seen leaving McRaes Department Store in Laurel, Mississippi, with
clothes he had not purchased valued at approximately $741. Bolton exited the store, placed the clothes in
his car, and proceeded to leave the parking lot. A McRaes manager, Larry Bass, chased Bolton outside the
store and attempted to stop him, but was unsuccessful. Bolton was later apprehended in his car by a Laurel
police officer and identified as the perpetrator.
ARGUMENT AND DISCUSSION OF LAW
¶3. Bolton argues on appeal numerous instances where the performance of his trial counsel was deficient
and that this deficient performance prejudiced his trial. Thus, Bolton contends that the verdict must be
reversed and a new trial granted. The Mississippi Supreme Court has adopted the Strickland v.
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-96 (1984) standard for evaluating ineffective assistance of counsel claims.
Eakes v. State, 665 So. 2d 852, 872 (Miss. 1995). A defendant has to show that his attorney's
performance was deficient, and that the deficiency was so substantial as to deprive the defendant of a fair
trial. Id. We require that the defendant prove both elements. Brown v. State, 626 So. 2d 114, 115 (Miss.
1993); Wilcher v. State, 479 So. 2d 710, 713 (Miss. 1985). In any case presenting an ineffective
assistance of counsel claim, the performance inquiry must be whether counsel's assistance was reasonable
considering all the circumstances. Foster v. State, 687 So. 2d 1124, 1129 (Miss. 1996). This is measured
by a totality of the circumstances, and thus, the Court must look at counsel's over-all performance. Taylor
v. State, 682 So. 2d 359, 363 (Miss. 1996). There is no constitutional right to errorless counsel.
Foster, 687 So. 2d at 1130 (emphasis added). "Judicial scrutiny of counsel's performance must be highly
deferential." Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689.
[T]here is a strong presumption that counsel's performance falls within the range of reasonable
professional assistance. To overcome this presumption, "[t]he defendant must show that there is a
reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would
have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the
outcome."
Schmitt v. State, 560 So. 2d 148, 154 (Miss. 1990) (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694).
¶4. Bolton complains that he was denied effective assistance of counsel on ten separate occasions. Taken
verbatim from his brief, Bolton argues that his attorney failed to conduct an adequate voir dire, although the
prosecutor conducted an in depth voir dire of the jury; he reserved opening statement but never gave one,
even though the prosecuting attorney gave a detailed and incriminating statement; he failed to cross-examine
the State's first witness, Officer Brian Boutwell, the first officer on the scene; he did not challenge the store
manager's in-court identification of the defendant even though there was testimony that it was suggestive; he
failed to object to the arresting officer's prejudicial hearsay testimony; he failed to conduct any crossexamination of the arresting officer; he failed to raise or ask for any challenge or hearing on the admissibility
of the defendant's confession; he failed to object to State Instruction S-1, which listed the elements of the
crime, but failed to state the term "feloniously," thereby arguably charging only the crime of misdemeanor
shoplifting; he gave a prejudicial closing argument whereby he confessed his client's guilt; and he failed to
ask for a pre-sentence investigation after conviction, or to even offer any mitigation to the trial judge prior to
sentencing, whereupon the trial judge unusually gave the defendant the maximum sentence of five years for
the crime, even though John Bolton, Jr. was a first time non-violent offender.
¶5. After careful review of the record, it is this Court's opinion that Bolton has failed to provide any
authority or evidence of how these instances constituted ineffectiveness. Furthermore, Bolton has failed to
demonstrate that there was reasonable probability that had counsel done the aforementioned, the result of
the trial would have been different. Voir dire, opening and closing statements, cross-examination,
objections, and challenges on the admissibility of evidence are considered to be matters of trial strategy and
will not support an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. As the State correctly stated in its brief, "[a]
ttorneys are permitted wide latitude in their choice and employment of defense strategy." See Hiter v.
State, 660 So. 2d 961, 965 (Miss. 1995). Generally, for purposes of ineffectiveness of counsel claims,
counsel has the duty to make reasonable investigations or to make reasonable decisions that investigation is
unnecessary. Foster, 687 So. 2d at 1132. Based on the foregoing discussion, there is no proof that
Bolton's trial counsel was deficient in his representation, much less that Bolton was prejudiced as a result.
However, we feel obligated to comment on certain remarks made by Bolton's counsel during his closing
argument. Although it is apparent from the record that he chose certain words as part of his trial strategy,
we would urge him in the future to be more cautious so as not give any appearance of portraying his client in
a contemptuous manner. This claim is without merit.
¶6. THE JUDGMENT OF THE JONES COUNTY CIRCUIT OF CONVICTION OF FELONY
SHOPLIFTING AND SENTENCE OF FIVE YEARS IN THE CUSTODY OF THE
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS IS AFFIRMED. ALL COSTS OF THIS
APPEAL ARE TAXED TO JONES COUNTY.
McMILLIN AND THOMAS, P.JJ., COLEMAN, DIAZ, KING, LEE, PAYNE, AND
SOUTHWICK, JJ., CONCUR.
IRVING, J., NOT PARTICIPATING.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.