VITEC LLC V DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY (Concurring Opinion)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS VITEC, LLC, UNPUBLISHED April 7, 2016 Plaintiff-Appellee, v No. 324330 Court of Claims LC Nos. 13-000027-MT 13-000128-MT DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, Defendant-Appellant. Before: HOEKSTRA, P.J., and METER and M. J. KELLY, JJ. METER, J. (concurring). I concur with the majority opinion because Hudsonville Creamery and Ice Cream Co, LLC v Dep’t of Treasury, ___ Mich ___; ___ NW2d ___ (2016) (Docket No. 322968), constitutes binding precedent. However, I continue to believe, in accordance with the analysis set forth in my dissenting opinion in Hudsonville Creamery, that the last sentence of MCL 208.1437(18) does not provide for a refund for an unused carryforward of credit. /s/ Patrick M. Meter -1-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.