SEFIKA ADEMI V STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY (Concurring Opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS SEFIKA ADEMI, UNPUBLISHED June 25, 2015 Plaintiff-Appellant, v No. 319934 Kent Circuit Court LC No. 12-002714-NF STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY and AMERISURE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees, and LANCER INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Before: BECKERING, P.J., and MARKEY and SHAPIRO, JJ. SHAPIRO, J. (concurring). If the applicable standard of review were de novo, I would conclude that the economist’s report provided to defendant constituted reasonable proof as to economic losses. However, the issue is close and I cannot conclude that the trial court’s findings, made after conducting a full bench trial, were clearly erroneous. See Arbor Farms, LLC v GeoStar Corp, 305 Mich App 374, 386-387; 853 NW2d 421 (2014). Accordingly, I concur. /s/ Douglas B. Shapiro -1-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
