LEON V BONNER V JAMES ROWELL (Concurring Opinion)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS LEON V. BONNER and MARILYN E. BONNER, UNPUBLISHED November 29, 2012 Plaintiffs-Appellants, v JAMES ROWELL, DANA FOSTER, KATHLEEN LAWRENCE, CHAD COOPER, JAMES MUZZIN, SHAWN PIPOLY, CLAUDIA ROBLEE and MAYOR RICCI BANDKAU, No. 303814 Livingston Circuit Court LC No. 11-025737-CZ Defendants-Appellees. Before: MARKEY, P.J., and MURRAY and SHAPIRO, JJ. MURRAY, J. (concurring in part, dissenting in part). I concur with the majority opinion except for its reversal of plaintiffs state constitutional procedural and substantive due process claims. For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Bonner v City of Brighton, __ Mich App __; __ NW2d __ (Docket No. 302677, issued ___ ), plaintiffs due process claims are without merit and should be dismissed, albeit for reasons different than those articulated by the trial court in this case. /s/ Christopher M. Murray -1-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.