JAMES TURNER ROBINSON JR V YU FEN TAN
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
JAMES TURNER ROBINSON, JR.,
UNPUBLISHED
December 16, 2008
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v
No. 281551
Wayne Circuit Court
LC No. 07-709153-NI
YU FEN TAN,
Defendant-Appellee.
Before: Cavanagh, P.J., and Jansen and Meter, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff appeals by right the circuit court’s order quashing service and dismissing
plaintiff’s action for failure to serve defendant before expiration of the summons. We affirm.
This appeal has been decided without oral argument. MCR 7.214(E).
Following an evidentiary hearing, the circuit court determined that plaintiff had not
served defendant in accordance with MCR 2.105. Although the process server completed a
proof service attesting to personal service on defendant, the process server testified at the hearing
that she actually served an unidentified man. Because defendant was not served before the
expiration of the summons and did not otherwise submit to the court’s jurisdiction, the circuit
court granted defendant’s motion to quash service and dismissed the action without prejudice
pursuant to MCR 2.102(E).
Plaintiff argues that strict compliance with the service of process rules is not required.
He contends that dismissal was improper because he and his process server “acted reasonably” in
trying to follow the court rules.
This Court reviews de novo issues involving the interpretation and application of court
rules. Associated Builders & Contractors v Dep’t of Consumer & Industry Services, 472 Mich
117, 123-124; 693 NW2d 374 (2005).
The court rules do not authorize the circuit court to excuse the lack of service on the basis
of a plaintiff’s reasonable efforts. MCR 2.102(E)(1) addresses the effect of failure to serve a
defendant with process before expiration of the summons:
On the expiration of the summons as provided in subrule (D), the action is
deemed dismissed without prejudice as to a defendant who has not been served
-1-
with process as provided in these rules, unless the defendant has submitted to the
court’s jurisdiction.
The limitation on the court’s discretion in this situation is evident in MCR 2.102(F), which
addresses the court’s ability to set aside the dismissal:
A court may set aside the dismissal of the action as to a defendant under
subrule (E) only on stipulation of the parties or when all of the following
conditions are met:
(1) within the time provided in subrule (D), service of process was in fact
made on the dismissed defendant, or the defendant submitted to the court’s
jurisdiction;
(2) proof of service of process was filed or the failure to file is excused for
good cause shown;
(3) the motion to set aside the dismissal was filed within 28 days after
notice of the order of dismissal was given, or, if notice of dismissal was not given,
the motion was promptly filed after the plaintiff learned of the dismissal.
[Emphasis added.]
These conditions were not satisfied in this case.
Plaintiff’s reliance on cases and court rules that concern improper service is misplaced
because the present case does not involve improper service, but rather a complete failure of
service, for which dismissal without prejudice was required. In re Gordon Estate, 222 Mich App
148, 157-158; 564 NW2d 497 (1997); see also Holliday v Townley, 189 Mich App 424, 426; 473
NW2d 733 (1991).
Plaintiff also argues that the circuit court should have required defendant’s husband,
Wayne Lee, to appear in court so that the process server could identify him as the man who
accepted the summons and complaint. Whether Lee was the individual who took the summons
and complaint is immaterial. Under Michigan law, service on a spouse is not a substitute for
personal service on a defendant.
Affirmed.
/s/ Mark J. Cavanagh
/s/ Kathleen Jansen
/s/ Patrick M. Meter
-2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.