PEOPLE OF MI V GREGORY WILLIAM SCHWARTZ
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,
UNPUBLISHED
October 19, 2004
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v
No. 247895
Calhoun Circuit Court
LC No. 02-004542-FC
GREGORY WILLIAM SCHWARTZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
Before: Griffin, P.J., and Saad and O'Connell, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
A jury convicted defendant of two counts of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree
(CSC I), the victim being under thirteen years of age1 and two counts of criminal sexual conduct
in the second degree (CSC II), the victim being under thirteen years of age.2 The trial court
sentenced defendant to two concurrent terms of fifteen to thirty years in prison for the CSC-I
convictions, and to seven years, two months to fifteen years in prison for the CSC-II convictions.
Defendant appeals his convictions and sentences, and we affirm.3
Defendant argues that he was denied due process by the omission of the parties’ closing
arguments from the trial transcript. The inability to obtain the transcripts of a criminal
proceeding may impede a defendant’s right to appeal to the extent that a new trial must be
ordered. The surviving record may be reviewed to determine whether it is sufficient to evaluate
the defendant’s claims on appeal. People v Federico, 146 Mich App 776, 799-800; 381 NW2d
819 (1985). The prosecution, upon receiving defendant’s brief on appeal, contacted the court
reporter and secured the production of the transcript of the parties’ closing arguments. The
specific issue raised by defendant on appeal has been rendered moot, see People v Briseno, 211
Mich App 11, 17; 535 NW2d 559 (1995), and defendant has not filed a supplemental brief
raising any issue based on the content of the parties’ closing arguments or any portion of the
remaining record. No issue remains for resolution.
1
MCL 750.520b(1)(a).
2
MCL 750.520c(1)(a)
3
This appeal is being decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E).
-1-
Affirmed.
/s/ Richard Allen Griffin
/s/ Henry William Saad
/s/ Peter D. O'Connell
-2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.