STEVEN P RAND V JACKSON CO ROAD COMM

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STEVEN P. RAND and AMANDA B. RAND, UNPUBLISHED February 3, 2004 Plaintiffs-Appellees, v No. 242961 Jackson Circuit Court LC No. 99-097100-CH JACKSON COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellant. Before: O’Connell, P.J., and Wilder and Murray, JJ. MURRAY, J. (concurring) I concur in the majority’s analysis and conclusion that the trial court did not follow the appropriate law in deciding the issues below. I also believe that remand is necessary in light of the rather low threshold of evidence required to overcome the rebuttable presumption that a road became a public highway under the highway by user statute. Kent Co Rd Comm v Hunting, 170 Mich App 222, 231; 428 NW2d 353 (1988). However, I would additionally hold that, for purposes of remand, there is no genuine issue as to any material fact that the road at issue is a public highway under the highway by user statute, MCL 221.20. This holds true because in their response to defendant’s motion for summary disposition, plaintiffs affirmatively indicated that the road was a public one under the highway by user statute. It is well-settled that statements of fact made by an attorney during judicial proceedings are binding on the client. Ann Arbor Tenants Union v Ann Arbor YMCA, 229 Mich App 431, 440; 581 NW2d 794 (1998); Ferndale v Ealand, 88 Mich App 107, 111; 276 NW2d 534, remanded on other grounds 406 Mich 963 (1979). In light of plaintiff’s admission that the facts presented established that the road became a public highway under the requirements of the highway by user statute, I believe the only issue to be resolved below is whether plaintiffs have produced sufficient evidence to overcome the rebuttable presumption that this is a public road under the highway by user statute. /s/ Christopher M. Murray -1-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.