PEOPLE OF MI V LEMOSE GLOVER
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,
UNPUBLISHED
August 2, 2002
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v
No. 231991
Wayne Circuit Court
LC No. 00-007988
LEMOSE GLOVER,
Defendant-Appellant.
Before: Murray, P.J., and Sawyer and Zahra, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Defendant appeals as of right from a conviction of bribery of a public official, MCL
750.117, for which he was sentenced to five years’ probation. We affirm.
To the extent defendant contends that he is entitled to postjudgment discovery to find
evidence that might have been helpful in his defense at trial, he has abandoned the issue by his
failure to cite appropriate authority. People v Davis, 241 Mich App 697, 700; 617 NW2d 381
(2000). Even if defendant had a right to postjudgment discovery, that would not aid his cause in
this Court because appeals are heard on the original record, MCR 7.210(A), and enlargement of
the record generally is not permitted. People v Warren, 228 Mich App 336, 356; 578 NW2d 692
(1998), rev’d in part on other grounds 462 Mich 415 (2000).
To the extent defendant contends trial counsel was ineffective for failing to conduct
pretrial discovery, he has failed to preserve the issue for appeal by including it in his statement of
questions presented. People v Brown, 239 Mich App 735, 748; 610 NW2d 234 (2000). Even if
the issue had been preserved, review would be limited to the record. People v Snider, 239 Mich
App 393, 423; 608 NW2d 502 (2000). The record is silent regarding the existence of any
admissible impeachment evidence in the officers’ files. Defendant has not shown that a
reasonable probability exists that, had counsel sought and obtained discovery of the files, the
outcome of the trial would have been different. People v Watkins, 247 Mich App 14, 30; 634
NW2d 370 (2001); People v Avant, 235 Mich App 499, 508; 597 NW2d 864 (1999).
Affirmed.
/s/ Christopher M. Murray
/s/ David H. Sawyer
/s/ Brian K. Zahra
-1-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
