JOSEPH A WYTRWAL V HARLO PRINTING CO
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
JOSEPH A. WYTRWAL,
UNPUBLISHED
June 4, 2002
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v
No. 229680
Wayne Circuit Court
LC No. 98-805905-CK
HARLO PRINTING COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellee,
and
PAUL DOBROCZYNSKI,
Defendant.
Before: Fitzgerald, P.J., and Holbrook, Jr., and Doctoroff, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Plaintiff appeals as of right the judgment of no cause of action entered against him. We
affirm. This appeal is being decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E).
On appeal, plaintiff identified as issues improper jury instructions on his breach of
contract claim, and violation of the Michigan Consumer Protection Act (MCPA), MCL 445.901,
et seq. However, because plaintiff failed to cite the jury instruction he disputes or present any
authority supporting a finding of error on either issue, these issues have been effectively
abandoned on appeal. Head v Phillips Camper Sales & Rental, Inc, 234 Mich App 94, 115-116;
593 NW2d 595 (1999). “This Court will not search for authority to sustain or reject a party’s
position.” Guardiola v Oakwood Hospital, 200 Mich App 524, 536; 504 NW2d 701 (1993).
Further, plaintiff did not plead a cause of action under the MCPA.
Affirmed.
/s/ E. Thomas Fitzgerald
/s/ Donald E. Holbrook, Jr.
/s/ Martin M. Doctoroff
-1-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
