IN RE PETERSON & VINSON MINORS
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
In the Matter of K.P., K.P., K.P. and C.V., Minors.
FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY,
UNPUBLISHED
April 19, 2002
Petitioner-Appellee,
v
No. 234634
Kent Circuit Court
Family Division
LC No. 99-071600-NA
RAYSHAWN VINSON,
Respondent-Appellant,
and
KENNETH PETERSON,
Respondent.
Before: K.F. Kelly, P.J., and Doctoroff and Cavanagh, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Respondent-appellant appeals as of right from the trial court order terminating her
parental rights to her minor children. We affirm.
The trial court did not err in finding that the statutory grounds for termination were
established by clear and convincing evidence. MCR 5.974(I); In re Miller, 433 Mich 331, 337;
445 NW2d 161 (1989). Further, the evidence did not show that termination of respondentappellant’s parental rights was clearly not in the best interests of the children. MCL
712A.19b(5); In re Trejo, 462 Mich 341, 356-357; 612 NW2d 407 (2000). The trial court
therefore did not err in terminating respondent-appellant’s parental rights to the children.
Affirmed.
/s/ Kirsten Frank Kelly
/s/ Martin M. Doctoroff
/s/ Mark J. Cavanagh
-1-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
