PEOPLE OF MI V DAWAD HELTON

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, UNPUBLISHED September 4, 2001 Plaintiff-Appellee, v No. 224951 Wayne Circuit Court LC No. 98-006303 DAWAD HELTON, Defendant-Appellant. Before: Fitzgerald, P.J., and Gage and C. H. Miel*, JJ. MEMORANDUM. Following a bench trial, defendant was convicted of possession with intent to deliver less than 50 grams of cocaine, MCL 333.7401(2)(a)(iv), and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, MCL 750.227b. The trial court sentenced him as a second felony offender, MCL 769.10, to one to twenty years’ imprisonment for the controlled substance conviction, to be served consecutively to the two-year sentence for the felony-firearm conviction. Defendant appeals as of right and we affirm. Defendant’s sole claim on appeal is that he was denied a fair trial when the trial judge recalled and questioned a prosecution witness after both sides rested. We agree with the prosecution that defendant has waived this issue. A defendant’s acquiescence to a trial court’s decision about how to proceed at trial waives the issue on appeal. People v Carter, 462 Mich 206, 214-216; 612 NW2d 144 (2000). The Carter Court distinguished between waiver, which it likened to an express approval of the court’s decision, and forfeiture, which involves a failure to object, and concluded that a waiver extinguishes any error. Id. Here, defense counsel specifically stated that he had no objection to the court recalling and questioning the witness. This amounts to an approval of the judge’s evidentiary decision on defendant’s behalf. Id. at 218-219. Because the waiver extinguished any error, reversal of defendant’s convictions is not warranted. Id. at 219-220. Affirmed. /s/ E. Thomas Fitzgerald /s/ Hilda R. Gage /s/ Charles H. Miel * Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment. -1-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.