HENRIETTA BRINEY V KELSEY-HAYES

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS HENRIETTA BRINEY, UNPUBLISHED August 21, 2001 Plaintiff-Appellee, v No. 218621 Wayne Circuit Court LC No. 96-643009-CK KELSEY-HAYES and VARITY CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellants. Before: O’Connell, P.J., and Fitzgerald and Wilder, JJ. O’CONNELL, P.J., (concurring). In the present case, the jury was presented with two equally sustainable positions. The first perspective was that the employees lost one week of “earned” or “accrued” vacation. The second is that the employees were not deprived of their “accrued” or “earned” vacation. Because I believe the evidence was capable of either determination, I am reluctant to interfere with the jury’s verdict. Affirmed. /s/ Peter D. O’Connell -1-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.