PEOPLE OF MI V SHANARD KNOLTON
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,
UNPUBLISHED
May 29, 2001
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v
No. 221973
Kent Circuit Court
LC No. 99-000961-FH
SHANARD KNOLTON,
Defendant-Appellant.
Before: McDonald, P.J., and Smolenski and K.F. Kelly, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Defendant was convicted by a jury of carrying a weapon on his person1, possession with
intent to deliver less than fifty grams of cocaine, second offense2, and possession of a firearm
during the commission of a felony3. He was sentenced to serve a mandatory two-year prison
term for the felony-firearm conviction, consecutive to prison terms of five to twenty years’ on the
narcotics conviction and three to five years’ on the weapons conviction. He appeals as of right,
and we affirm.
Defendant argues on appeal that his indeterminate sentences are disproportionate. We
disagree. Under the subsequent-offender provision of the Controlled Substances Act4, defendant
was subject to double the minimum penalty authorized by MCL 333.7401(2)(a)(iv); MSA
14.15(7401)(2)(a)(iv), which mandates a prison sentence of not less than one year nor more than
twenty years. People v Davenport, 205 Mich App 399, 401; 522 NW2d 339 (1994). Although
the sentencing guidelines are not applicable to a defendant whose sentence is enhanced under
§ 7413(2), People v White, 208 Mich App 126, 135; 527 NW2d 34 (1994), the sentence imposed
must be proportionate to the seriousness of the circumstances surrounding the offense and the
offender, People v Milbourn, 435 Mich 630, 661; 461 NW2d 1 (1990); People v Green, 205
Mich App 342; 517 NW2d 782 (1994). Under the circumstances of this offender and the
1
MCL 750.227; MSA 28.424.
2
MCL 333.7401(2)(a)(iv);MSA 14.15(7401)(2)(a)(iv); MCL 333.7413(2); MSA 14.15(7413)(2).
3
MCL 750.227b; MSA 28.424(2).
4
MCL 333.7413(2); MSA 14.15(7413)(2).
-1-
seriousness of the current offenses, we conclude that defendant’s sentences do not violate the
principle of proportionality.
Affirmed.
/s/ Gary R. McDonald
/s/ Michael R. Smolenski
/s/ Kirsten Frank Kelly
-2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.