IN RE POMEROY MINORS
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
In the Matter of RYAN C. POMEROY and
KELSEY N. POMEROY, Minors.
FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY,
UNPUBLISHED
May 25, 2001
Petitioner-Appellee,
v
CONSTANCE FALING-WOJTUSIK, , a/k/a
CONSTANCE FALING, a/k/a CONNIE FALING,
No. 230666
Jackson Circuit Court
Family Division
LC No. 97-019258-NA
Respondent-Appellant,
and
BRIAN FALING,
Respondent.
Before: Jansen, P.J., and Zahra and Owens, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Respondent-appellant appeals as of right from the family court order terminating her
parental rights to the minor children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(b)(ii) and (l); MSA
27.3178(598.19b)(3)(b)(ii) and (l). We affirm. This case is being decided without oral argument
pursuant to MCR 7.214(E).
The family court did not clearly err in finding that the statutory grounds for termination
were established by clear and convincing evidence. MCR 5.974(I); In re Miller, 433 Mich 331,
337; 445 NW2d 161 (1989). Further the evidence did not show that termination of respondentappellant’s parental rights was clearly not in the children’s best interests. MCL 712A.19b(5);
MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(5); In re Trejo Minors, 462 Mich 341, 356-357; 612 NW2d 407 (2000).
-1-
Thus the family court did not err in terminating respondent-appellant’s parental rights to the
children.
Affirmed.
/s/ Kathleen Jansen
/s/ Brian K. Zahra
/s/ Donald S. Owens
-2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
