IN RE SEQUOYAH ANGINIQUE ANDERSON MINOR
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
In the Matter of SEQUOYAH ANGINIQUE
ANDERSON, Minor.
FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY,
UNPUBLISHED
April 13, 2001
Petitioner-Appellee,
v
No. 222892
Wayne Circuit Court
Family Division
LC No. 96-336887
CORDIAH DEVON HUNTER,
Respondent-Appellant,
and
GARY ARNESS ANDERSON,
Respondent.
In the Matter of SEQUOYAH ANGINIQUE
ANDERSON, Minor.
FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY,
Petitioner-Appellee,
v
No. 222900
Wayne Circuit Court
Family Division
LC No. 96-336887
CORDIAH DEVON HUNTER,
Respondent,
and
GARY ARNESS ANDERSON,
-1-
Respondent-Appellant.
Before: Talbot, P.J., and Sawyer and F.L. Borchard*, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
In these consolidated appeals, respondents appeal as of right from the trial court order
terminating their parental rights to the minor child pursuant to MCL 712A.19b(3)(c)(i), (g), and
(i); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(3)(c)(i), (g), and (i). We affirm. This case is being decided without
oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E).
The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the statutory grounds for termination
were established by clear and convincing evidence. MCR 5.974(I); In re Trejo, 462 Mich 341,
356-357; 612 NW2d 407 (2000); In re Miller, 433 Mich 331, 337; 445 NW2d 161 (1989).
Further, the evidence failed to show that termination of respondents’ parental rights was clearly
not in the child’s best interests. MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(5); Trejo, supra at
356-357. Thus, the trial court did not err in terminating respondents’ parental rights to the child.
Affirmed.
/s/ Michael J. Talbot
/s/ David H. Sawyer
/s/ Fred L. Borchard
* Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment.
-2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
