IN RE LATESHA HALL MINOR
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
In the Matter of LATESHA HALL, Minor.
FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY,
UNPUBLISHED
January 30, 2001
Petitioner-Appellee,
v
No. 229498
Kent Circuit Court
Family Division
LC No. 88-021706-NA
THOMAS HALL,
Respondent-Appellant,
and
DORENIA LINDSEY,
Respondent.
Before: Collins, P.J., and Doctoroff and White, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Respondent-appellant appeals as of right from the family court order terminating his
parental rights to the minor child under MCL 712A.19b(3)(g); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(3)(g).
We affirm.
The family court did not clearly err in finding that the statutory ground for termination
was established by clear and convincing evidence. MCR 5.974(I); In re Miller, 433 Mich 331,
337; 445 NW2d 161 (1989). Further, the evidence did not show that termination of respondentappellant’s parental rights was clearly not in the child’s best interests. MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA
27.3178(598.19b)(5); In re Trejo Minors, 462 Mich 341, 356-357; 612 NW2d 407 (2000). Thus,
the family court did not err in terminating respondent-appellant’s parental right to the child.
-1-
Affirmed.
/s/ Jeffrey G. Collins
/s/ Martin M. Doctoroff
/s/ Helene N. White
-2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
