IN RE JOHNSON MINORS
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
In the Matter of LATESA SHAMBRA JOHNSON,
ROXANNE JASMINE JOHNSON and
RAHNESHA NOEL JOHNSON, Minors.
FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY,
UNPUBLISHED
July 21, 2000
Petitioner-Appellee,
v
No. 223226
Ingham Circuit Court
Family Division
LC No. 0-004623
JUANITA JOHNSON,
Respondent -Appellant,
and
RODERICK LARON TAYLOR a/k/a RON
DONELSON,
Respondent.
Before: Saad, P.J., and Hoekstra and Markey, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Respondent-appellant as of right from a family court order terminating her parental rights to the
minor children pursuant to MCL 712A.19b(3)(c)(i), (g) and (j); MSA 27.3178(598.19b) (3)(c)(i), (g)
and (j). We affirm.
The family court did not clearly err in finding that the statutory grounds for termination were
established by clear and convincing evidence. MCR 5.974(I); In re Miller, 433 Mich 331, 337; 445
NW2d 161 (1989). We further find no clear error in the family court’s determination that termination of
respondent-appellant’s parental rights was not clearly contrary to the children’s best interests. MCL
712A.19b(5); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(5); In re Hall-Smith, 222 Mich App 470, 472-473; 564
-1
NW2d 156 (1997). Thus, the family court did not err in terminating respondent-appellant’s parental
rights to the children. Id.
Affirmed.
/s/ Henry William Saad
/s/ Joel P. Hoekstra
/s/ Jane E. Markey
-2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
