IN RE LEGEND DENZEL JEMISON MINOR
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
In the Matter of LEGEND DENZEL JEMISON,
Minor.
FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY,
UNPUBLISHED
April 18, 2000
Petitioner-Appellee,
v
No. 218880
St. Clair Circuit Court
Family Division
LC No. 98-004506-NA
LADAWN BANKS,
Respondent-Appellant,
and
CHESTER JEMISON,
Respondent.
Before: Gribbs, P.J., and Doctoroff and T.L. Ludington*, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Respondent-appellant appeals as of right from the family court order terminating her parental
rights to the minor child under MCL 712A.19b(3)(g), (i) and (j); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(3)(g), (i)
and (j). We affirm.
The family court did not clearly err in finding that the statutory grounds for termination were
established by clear and convincing evidence.1 MCR 5.974(I); In re Miller, 433 Mich 331, 337; 445
NW2d 161 (1989). Further, respondent-appellant failed to show that termination of her parental rights
was clearly not in the child's best interests. MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(5); In re
Hall-Smith, 222 Mich App 470, 472-473; 564 NW2d 156 (1997).
* Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment.
-1
Thus, the family court did not err in terminating respondent-appellant's parental rights to the child.
Affirmed.
/s/ Roman S. Gribbs
/s/ Martin M. Doctoroff
/s/ Thomas L. Ludington
1
Respondent also argues that it was improper to terminate her parental rights under MCL
712A.19b(3)(l); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(3)(l) because that subsection is unconstitutional. Although
termination was requested under § 19b(3)(l), the record does not indicate that the family court relied on
that subsection as a basis for termination. Therefore, it is unnecessary to address this issue.
-2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
