IN RE CLEVENSHIRE MINORS
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
In the Matter of ANGILA MONIQUE
CLEVENSHIRE,
NATASHA
NICOLE
CLEVENSHIRE,
EUSTACE
WINSLOW
CLEVENSHIRE, II and CHRISTOPHER NELSON
CLEVENSHIRE, Minors.
FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY,
UNPUBLISHED
April 4, 2000
Petitioner-Appellee,
v
No. 218389
Wayne Circuit Court
Family Division
LC No. 97-349894
LINDA GAIL CARTER,
Respondent-Appellant,
and
EUSTACE WINSLOW CLEVENSHIRE,
Respondent.
Before: Wilder, P.J., and Sawyer and Markey, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Respondent-appellant appeals as of right from the family court order terminating her parental
rights to the minor children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(c)(i), (g) and (j); MSA
27.3178(598.19b)(3)(c)(i), (g) and (j). We affirm. This case is being decided without oral argument
pursuant to MCR 7.214(E).
The family court did not clearly err in finding that the statutory grounds for termination were
established by clear and convincing evidence. MCR 5.974(I); In re Miller, 433 Mich 331, 337; 445
NW2d 161 (1989). Further, respondent-appellant failed to show that termination of her parental rights
-1
was clearly not in the children’s best interests. MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(5); In re
Hall-Smith, 222 Mich App 470, 472-473; 564 NW2d 156 (1997). Thus, the family court did not err
in terminating respondent-appellant’s parental rights to the children. Id.
Affirmed.
/s/ Kurtis T. Wilder
/s/ David H. Sawyer
/s/ Jane E. Markey
-2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.