ANDREW MILLER V TENNECO AUTOMOTIVE INC

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ANDREW MILLER and BARBARA MILLER, UNPUBLISHED December 28, 1999 Plaintiffs-Appellants, v TENNECO AUTOMOTIVE, INC., a/k/a TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE, d/b/a WALKER MANUFACTURING COMPANY, and JOHN ULERY, No. 213482 Hillsdale Circuit Court LC No. 96-026317 CZ Defendants-Appellees. Before: McDonald, P.J., and Neff and Smolenski, JJ. SMOLENSKI, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part). I concur in the majority’s decision in all respects except that I would affirm the trial court’s order dismissing plaintiffs’ claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress. In my opinion, defendants’ actions were not the type of extreme and outrageous conduct sufficient to create liability under a theory of intentional infliction of emotional distress. /s/ Michael R. Smolenski

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.