VALERIA HALIW V CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
VALERIA HALIW and ILKO HALIW,
UNPUBLISHED
October 5, 1999
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v
No. 206886
Macomb Circuit Court
LC No. 97-000036 NO
CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS,
Defendant-Appellant.
Before: Collins, P.J., and Sawyer and Cavanagh, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals by leave granted the trial court order denying its motion for summary
disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7) and (10). We affirm.
We review a trial court’s decision with regard to a motion for summary disposition de novo as a
question of law. Ardt v Titan Ins Co, 233 Mich App 685, 688; 593 NW2d 215 (1999). Summary
disposition is proper under MCR 2.116(C)(7) when a claim is barred because of immunity granted by
law. The motion should not be granted unless no factual development could provide a basis for
recovery. Huron Potawatomi, Inc v Stinger, 227 Mich App 127, 130; 574 NW2d 706 (1997). A
motion brought pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10) tests the factual support for the plaintiff’s claim.
Summary disposition is properly granted when there is no genuine issue of material fact, and the moving
party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Gumma v D & T Construction Co, 235 Mich App
210, 214; 597 NW2d 207 (1999).
Defendant argues that the trial court erred in denying its motion for summary disposition because
plaintiffs’ claim is barred by the natural accumulation doctrine. Under the natural accumulation doctrine,
a governmental agency does not have an obligation to remove a natural accumulation of ice or snow
from a highway. Skogman v Chippewa Co Rd Comm, 221 Mich App 351, 353; 561 NW2d 503
(1997). The highway exception to governmental immunity applies to sidewalks. MCL 691.1401(e);
MSA 3.996(101)(e).
Defendant’s argument fails, however, because plaintiffs do not allege that Valeria Haliw fell
because of a natural accumulation of ice and snow. Rather, plaintiffs claim that the fall was caused by
-1
an unnatural accumulation of ice and snow resulting from a depression in the sidewalk. Thus, in addition
to the presence of snow and ice, plaintiffs allege that there was a defect in the sidewalk itself, and
therefore their claim is not barred by the natural accumulation doctrine. See Hopson v Detroit, 235
Mich 248, 250; 209 NW 161 (1926); Woodworth v Brenner, 69 Mich App 277, 281; 244 NW2d
446 (1976).
Defendant also asserts that the defect claimed by plaintiffs is insufficient to support the
imposition of liability. Plaintiffs submitted the testimony of an expert witness who opined that the
sidewalk contained several defects, most notably a depression that caused water to pond in a two- or
three-foot square area. Defendant is correct that there is no requirement that streets or sidewalks be
completely level. See Bigelow v Kalamazoo, 97 Mich 121, 123; 56 NW 339 (1893). Defendant is
only required to keep its sidewalks “in reasonable repair so that [they are] reasonably safe and
convenient for public travel.” MCL 691.1402(1); MSA 3.996(102)(1). However, plaintiffs’ expert
testified that, where the fall occurred, the condition of two sidewalk slabs created a “trip hazard” that
posed a danger to pedestrians and bicyclists. Although defendant disputes the expert’s conclusions, a
court may not assess credibility or determine facts when considering a motion for summary disposition.
Downey v Charlevoix Co Bd of Co Rd Comm’rs, 227 Mich App 621, 626; 576 NW2d 712 (1998).
Here, plaintiffs presented evidence creating a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether the
sidewalk where Valeria Haliw fell was reasonably safe for public travel. Accordingly, the trial court did
not err in denying defendant’s motion for summary disposition.
Affirmed.
/s/ Jeffrey G. Collins
/s/ David H. Sawyer
/s/ Mark J. Cavanagh
-2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.