IN RE WARD HOLMES ROGERS & MCGHEE MINORS
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
In the Matter of TERRANCE WARD, JERVON
WARD, GUYBRIA WARD, RAY HOLMES, JR.,
ROBERT ROGERS, JHYRA ROGERS, CHARLES
ROGERS and RICKY MCGHEE, a/k/a RICKY
MCGEE, Minors.
FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY,
UNPUBLISHED
August 13, 1999
Petitioner-Appellee,
v
No. 214398
Calhoun Circuit Court
Family Division
LC No. 95-000049 NA
MARY WARD,
Respondent-Appellant,
and
CHARLES ROGERS, RAY HOLMES, SR. and
RICHARD MCGEE,
Respondents.
In the Matter of ROBERT ROGERS, JHYRA
ROGERS and CHARLES ROGERS, Minors.
FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY,
Petitioner-Appellee,
v
No. 216092
Calhoun Circuit Court
Family Division
CHARLES ROGERS, SR.,
-1
LC No. 95-000049 NA
Respondent-Appellant,
and,
MARY WARD, RAY HOLMES, SR., and
RICHARD MCGEE,
Respondents.
Before: White, P.J., and Markey and Wilder, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
In these consolidated cases, respondents-appellants appeal as of right from the family court
order terminating their parental rights to the minor children pursuant to MCL 712A.19b(3)(c)(i), (g) and
(j); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(3)(c)(i), (g) and (j). We affirm.
The family court did not clearly err in finding that statutory grounds for termination were
established by clear and convincing evidence. MCR 5.974(I), In re Miller, 433 Mich 331, 337; 445
NW2d 161 (1989). Further, respondent-appellants failed to show that termination of their parental
rights was clearly not in the children’s best interests. MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(5);
In re Hall-Smith, 222 Mich App 470; 564 NW2d 156 (1997). Thus, the family court did not err in
terminating respondents-appellants’ parental rights to the children. Id.
Affirmed.
/s/ Helene N. White
/s/ Jane E. Markey
/s/ Kurtis T. Wilder
-2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.