IN RE VANCE MINORS

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS __________________________________________ In the Matter of MYLIN VAUGHN VANCE and WYATT HAYDEN VANCE, Minors. FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY, UNPUBLISHED May 28, 1999 Petitioner-Appellee, v PAMELA GAY RAUSER, a/k/a PAMELA GAY KOROTNEY, a/k/a PAMELA VANCE, No. 213800 Wayne Circuit Court Family Division LC No. 93-311431 Respondent-Appellant, and JEFFERY LYNN VANCE, Respondent. Before: Griffin, P.J., and Cavanagh and Fitzgerald, JJ. MEMORANDUM. Respondent-appellant appeals as of right from the family court order terminating her parental rights to the minor children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(a)(ii), (c)(i), (g), and (j); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(3)(a)(ii), (c)(i), (g), and (j). We affirm. The family court did not clearly err in finding that §§ 19b(3)(c)(i) and (j) were established by clear and convincing evidence. MCR 5.974(I); In re Miller, 433 Mich 331, 337; 445 NW2d 161 (1989). Respondent-appellant does not argue, nor does the record indicate, that termination of respondent-appellant’s parental rights was clearly not in the children’s best interests. MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(5); MCR 5.974(E)(2); In re Hall-Smith, 222 Mich App 470, -1 472-473; 564 NW2d 156 (1997). Thus, the family court did not err in terminating respondent appellant’s parental rights to the children. Id. -2 Affirmed. /s/ Richard Allen Griffin /s/ Mark J. Cavanagh /s/ E. Thomas Fitzgerald -3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.