PEOPLE OF MI V CREIGHTON RICHARD MORRISON

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, UNPUBLISHED May 21, 1999 Plaintiff-Appellee, v No. 202578 St Clair Circuit Court LC No. 96-002204 FC CREIGHTON RICHARD MORRISON, Defendant-Appellant. Before: Griffin, P.J., and Cavanagh and Fitzgerald, JJ. MEMORANDUM. Defendant appeals by right his plea-based conviction for assault with intent to commit second­ degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520g(2); MSA 28.788(7)(2). We affirm. This appeal is being decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E). Defendant asserts without specificity that his sentence was based on inaccurate information. Defendant has failed to preserve this issue for appellate review. The plain language of MCL 771.14(5); MSA 28.1144(5) and MCR 6.425(D)(2)(b) require a defendant to challenge the accuracy of any information contained in the presentence investigation report at the time of sentencing. This Court has declined to allow postsentencing preservation of issues concerning the accuracy of presentencing information in light of the statutory language. People v Sharp, 192 Mich App 501, 504; 481 NW2d 773 (1992). Where defendant has failed to even identify what information in the presentence report is inaccurate, he has presented no basis on which this Court could review his claim. Affirmed. /s/ Richard Allen Griffin /s/ Mark J. Cavanagh /s/ E. Thomas Fitzgerald -1­

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.