PEOPLE OF MI V FRANK JAMES ERVIN
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,
UNPUBLISHED
April 30, 1999
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v
No. 209719
Berrien Circuit Court
LC No. 97-406525 FH
FRANK JAMES ERVIN,
Defendant-Appellant.
Before: Kelly, P.J., and Neff and Smolenski, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Defendant pleaded guilty to breaking and entering a building with the intent to commit larceny,
MCL 750.110; MSA 28.305, and was sentenced to three to ten years’ imprisonment, to be served
consecutively to any sentence defendant was then serving as a result of his parolee status. Defendant
appeals by leave. We affirm. This case is being decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR
7.214(E).
Defendant is not entitled to resentencing. The record reveals that the trial court was aware of
the sentencing guidelines’ range. Although the court failed to speak the magic words “I am departing
from the sentencing guidelines’ recommendation,” the failure constitutes harmless error. People v
Kreger, 214 Mich App 549, 554-555; 543 NW2d 55 (1995). The “key test” of sentence
proportionality is not whether the sentence imposed departs from or adheres to the guidelines’
recommended range, but whether it reflects the seriousness of the matter. People v Houston, 448
Mich 312, 320; 532 NW2d 508 (1995). Here, defendant’s sentence is proportionate to the
circumstances of the offense and offender and the trial court adequately explained its reasons for
imposing the sentence it did. People v Milbourn, 435 Mich 630, 635-636; 461 NW2d 1 (1990);
Kreger, supra. We decline to remand so that the trial court might
-1
complete a sentencing information report departure form as that task would constitute a waste of judicial
resources. Kreger, supra.
Affirmed.
/s/ Michael J. Kelly
/s/ Janet T. Neff
/s/ Michael R. Smolenski
-2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.