PEOPLE OF MI V BRIAN D RASHID

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, UNPUBLISHED April 30, 1999 Plaintiff-Appellee, v No. 205518 Oakland Circuit Court LC No. 96-144931 FH 96-144932 FH BRIAN D. RASHID, Defendant-Appellant. Before: Kelly, P.J., and Neff and Smolenski, JJ. MEMORANDUM. In lower court docket no. 96-144931-FH, defendant pleaded guilty to delivery of 50 grams or more, but less than 225 grams, of cocaine, MCL 333.7401(1) and (2)(a)(iii); MSA 14.15(7401)(1) and (2)(a)(iii), and received a sentence of ten to twenty years’ imprisonment. In lower court docket no. 96-144932-FH, defendant pleaded guilty to delivery of 50 grams of more, but less than 225 grams, of cocaine, and possession with intent to deliver marijuana, MCL 333.7401(1) and (2)(d)(iii); MSA 14.15(7401)(1) and (2)(d)(iii), and received consecutive sentences of ten to twenty years’ imprisonment and one to four years’ imprisonment, respectively. The sentences imposed in docket no. 96-144932-FH are to be served consecutively to the sentence imposed in docket no 96-144931-FH. Defendant appeals by leave. We affirm. These cases are being decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E). Although defendant lacked a criminal history, had gainful employment and cooperated with law enforcement authorities, the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it concluded that these factors, as well as other factors offered, did not constitute substantial and compelling reasons to depart from the statutory minimum sentences, particularly in light of the amount of controlled substances distributed or possessed and the amount of money seized, factors which reflect defendant’s substantial involvement in the trafficking of controlled substances. People v Fields, 448 Mich 58, 76-79; 528 NW2d 176 (1995); People v Johnson (On Remand), 223 Mich -1­ App 170, 172-174; 566 NW2d 28 (1997); People v Ealy, 222 Mich App 508, 512; 564 NW2d 168 (1997). Affirmed. /s/ Michael J. Kelly /s/ Janet T. Neff /s/ Michael R. Smolenski -2­

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.